Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: That's stupid from a gaming standpoint *SP*
Posted By: Louis Wu <halo@bungie.org>	Date: 9/19/10 5:31 p.m.
: I'm gonna have to agree with HP and Cody about : how I shouldn't have to look at outside info or press start to see what my : objective is to understand what it is that I'm doing or what actually : happened in the game after I did it. Oh, give me a break. This is getting stupid. You're mad because you have to read the Journal in order to reconcile what's in the first book? Either ignore the books altogether (in which case Reach makes fine sense on its own - the only problems are reconciling what you learned in older books with what happened in-game) or accept that there might be useful (important) info in ANY book. You don't get to pick and choose WHICH books you can read and know how it all fits together. tl;dr: The games are internally consistent. The universe is ALMOST internally consistent. Mixing the first with PART of the second leads to confusion.

Message Index