Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Interesting Frankie Quote | |
| Posted By: bluerunner | Date: 6/13/11 12:22 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Interesting Frankie Quote (Louis Wu) : I should be really, really clear, because apparently ambiguity leads to : suffering. : I'm not saying that the assumption you mention is wrong. I'm saying it MIGHT : be wrong. I'm saying there MIGHT be explanations that, in hindsight, make : sense without making a mockery of continuity or canon. : mnemesis mentioned The Hangover. I think it's an apt example of how this : might work. : It's also possible that 343 simply decided to strap on boosters because they : look cool. I won't know until I play the game - but I'll wait until then : to be annoyed. :) I gotcha. For all we know, this scene could be at the end of Halo 4. You can see from this thread that I haven't really been in this discussion. The Chief having thrusters or different armor doesn't bother me that much. I just wonder what the thought process was behind revealing those things in a way that might confuse a lot of folks. I mean, look at the way they reacted over his gauntlets between Halo 2 and 3. Even the smallest unexplained changes will whip people into a frenzy.
| |
|
| Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |