Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Interesting Frankie Quote | |
| Posted By: Narcogen <narcogen@rampancy.net> | Date: 6/10/11 1:49 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: Interesting Frankie Quote (DHalo) : But it is seemingly because they haven't explained it yet. One example, which : I already gave, is gameplay alteration. They ARE possibilities, you're : just not open to any of them. I'm not open to it, in this case, because there's no cause for demonstrating a gameplay alteration in a cinematic cutscene. Yes, weapons and player capabilities have to be malleable. I get it. It is worth noting, however, that previous cinematic cutscenes have avoided these areas, mostly by avoiding gameplay-like situations. If the jetpack is a gameplay change, it should be displayed in gameplay footage. That makes it easier for the audience to suspend disbelief when faced with changes that are needed for gameplay reasons that would otherwise conflict. Note again that previous uses, like Equipment, were designed in such a way that made such a division unnecessary, because they were external to the armor. : Johnson himself is a retcon. There was never supposed to be a
Johnson is not a retcon. His name was a retcon-- but if you believe Loftus, even that's not true, since his name is in the credits and the filesystem.
| |
|
| Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |