Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Something else I don't like about "Halo 2.0" | |
| Posted By: Metalingus627 <mtracy627@yahoo.com> | Date: 1/10/13 10:57 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Something else I don't like about "Halo 2.0" (Postmortem) : Keep in mind that they were on the verge of extinction. High Charity was : their new "homeworld" after the star in their system went : supernova. Those that weren't on High Charity were serving on military : ships and Covenant controlled planets. Since High Charity fell to the : Flood, and any Prophets on Elite ships were killed, it's unlikely that the : small remaining number of Prophets on Brute ships actually could have : survived. And if they did, their population would seem too small for their : species to survive. : The only way Prophets would ever come to be a threat again in any large
: That actually would have been/still could be a cool way to introduce a newly
: I dunno, I've always wanted to see this story explored more. Something I thought of recently was why the "Covenant remnant" wasn't a Prophet/Brute lead force that survived the end of Halo 3 and was still very much hostile with the Elites and Humanity. Hell, it's even implied in "The Return." As many problems as I had with Halo 3, I personally wouldn't have minded if we were still fighting that particular military structure (with Elites on our side again), rather than seemingly inexplicably finding Elites back at the helm of our troubles.
| |
|
| Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |