Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Halo 2 was rushed? What about Halo 1?!?! | |
Posted By: jfitzell <james.fitzell@gmail.com> | Date: 12/2/04 6:59 p.m. |
In Response To: Halo 2 was rushed? What about Halo 1?!?! (Bey Bey Bey) : P.S.: The pistol in Halo sucked. No questions about it. It was lovely in
I hate to be one of those annoying people who only reply to the end of a post... but, while my opinions are in-line with Mothergoats, I agree with everything else you've said. However I have to disagree with your comment about the pistol whore's. For starters it is very difficult to hit a moving target in the head three times. And the ranking system should have removed the element of people playing vastly more skilled players. Secondly everyone started with the pistol, so even if it's unbalanced you're on an equal playing field. Thirdly, what do you think of the Shotgun and Sword in Halo 2? Every MP game I've played becomes a race for one of those weapons... and since there are only ever 2 shotguns and one sword in play at any one time then the other players have no real defence. Once you have a shotgun or sword you can own... you're not infallible, but I really think these weapons are vastly more unbalanced than the Halo 1 pistol was (even though they only work at close range). Initially I hated campaign and liked multiplayer. I'm now finding more and more that the I enjoy campagin (although not as much as Halo 1) but find the multiplayer so unbalanced that I don't feel that my score has any relation to my skill. Anyway, my two cents. I like Halo 2... it's a great game... But Halo 1 was a GREAT GREAT game. Wraith |
|
Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |