Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: This will throw you through the wall | |
Posted By: hunt3r <the87th@yahoo.com> | Date: 6/14/12 6:42 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: This will throw you through the wall (Jillybean) : My irritation comes from the lazy way Shaw's infertility is lumped in with : her search for life, because of course a woman may only be interesting if : she's being raped/wanting babies/struggling for daddy's approval. Gods : save us if ever a woman might have to find some other characteristics. 1. your indictment of shaw's character implies that her infertility is the only aspect of her character that makes her interesting. I'm right with you on this one - it's dumb and awkwardly lumped in. However, I think her character is plenty interesting without being barren. Shaw is a badass, and as David says, has 'quite the survival instinct'. There is much more to her character, and it's a bit unfair to imply that audiences would find her boring if he had a functional uterus. She also embarks on a very
2. I think writers include "rape/wanting babies/struggling for daddy's approval" not because they're the only ways to make characters interesting, but because they are the only ways directors know to get "quality acting" out of females. It's an unfortunate trope that female characters have to have some traditional female weakness (those mentioned above), and few writers want to make a female character without that, for fear that she'll lose her female identity in the process. Female characters in sci-fi cinema that have circumvented these tropes are few and far between. Off hand, the only one i can think of is Dr. Ellie Sattler (jurassic park - movie, not book).
|
|
Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |