glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


Re: Reprinted from my Rampancy.net posts:
Posted By: Roger Wilco <jordan@edelldesigns.com>Date: 12/7/05 5:58 p.m.

In Response To: Reprinted from my Rampancy.net posts: (Anton P. Nym (aka Steve))

: ... how many films rivaled classic novels in the first thirty years of their
: production?

: Taking the invention of Lumiere's camera in 1895 as the origin of the modern
: movie; that takes us to 1925. By that time I know of only one film that
: met Mr. Ebert's criteria, and by his own admission it's one he'd rather
: forget: The Birth of a Nation, 1915. (Indeed, films didn't even have sound
: at that point... aside from a few experiments, films were silent until
: 1929.)

: Video games have come a long way since Pong's home release in 1975. They just
: haven't gone far enough to create a new method of story-telling or art
: that uniquely suits it as a medium.

: -- Steve just hopes that the first video-game "art" won't be a paen
: to bigotry.

: (P.S. a version of this post is going to the Answerman site. I'd be very
: interested to see the response, if any.)

: Message text enclosed: I find myself dismayed by your response to Andrew
: Davis' letter about the artistic merit of video games. To write off an
: entire medium after only 30 years is premature, to say the least; I can
: imagine authors and playwrights in the early years of film sneering at its
: limitations as well. The current lack of a great video game artwork is not
: a limitation of the medium, anymore than film’s inability to respond to
: audience reaction or its inflexible linear presentation (no “paging back”
: to re-read an earlier chapter!) relegated it eternally to the “craft and
: diversion” status it held in its earlier years.

: Perhaps games are waiting for their equivalent of the “talkie”, a radical
: advance in technology; or perhaps they’re waiting for another D.W.
: Griffith to focus less on the medium and more on the message. (However
: distasteful that message may be.)

: Video games simply haven’t had their “Birth of a Nation” yet. Perhaps it will
: descend from 1995’s “Marathon” series, a narrative written in scattered
: (and often incomplete) pieces left for the player to find,
: read/hear/absorb, and assemble. Perhaps it will descend from 2003's
: “Knights of the Old Republic” series, a mythic tale that branches into new
: narratives depending upon the actions of the player. Who knows, it may
: even descend from 1998's “Dance Dance Revolution” series, as a whole new
: form of immersive ballet. Or perhaps it will be something entirely
: different.

: But to write off the interactive entertainment genre as incapable of
: producing art is to make the same mistake as those who saw the clumsy
: shadow shows a century ago and dismissed film as a frivolous toy.

: As a postscript, games are no more of “a loss of precious hours we have
: available to make ourselves more cultured, civilized, and empathetic” than
: your typical popcorn flick or slushy romance novel… indeed, in their
: multiplayer aspect they can be superior to both by at least encouraging
: some kind of social interaction. That some players choose antisocial
: behavior instead is no more an indictment of video games than talking in
: theatres is the fault of movies.

This whole thing reminds me of the scene in History of the World: Part I in which Chief Caveman Sid Ceasar paints the worlds first piece of art on the cave wall and immediately the worlds first art critic appears. He looks it over, then stands up on a nearby rock and literally pisses all over it.

Why? Because he didn't get it.

If we are talking about the questionable social and cultural relevance of something, I nominate the art critic.


Message Index




Replies:

Rebuttal to Narcogen's Article on Story and GameBrian Graham 12/7/05 4:12 p.m.
     Re: Rebuttal to Narcogen's Article on Story and GaDucain 12/7/05 4:27 p.m.
           Re: Rebuttal to Narcogen's Article on Story and GaNarcogen 12/7/05 9:47 p.m.
     I do wonder...Anton P. Nym (aka Steve) 12/7/05 4:29 p.m.
           Re: I do wonder...Brian Graham 12/7/05 4:57 p.m.
                 Reprinted from my Rampancy.net posts:Anton P. Nym (aka Steve) 12/7/05 5:03 p.m.
                       Re: Reprinted from my Rampancy.net posts:Roger Wilco 12/7/05 5:58 p.m.
                             metacriticismNarcogen 12/7/05 9:51 p.m.
                                   Re: metacriticismRoger Wilco 12/7/05 11:23 p.m.
                       Re: Reprinted from my Rampancy.net posts:Brian Graham 12/7/05 8:25 p.m.
                             Re: Reprinted from my Rampancy.net posts:Anton P. Nym (aka Steve) 12/7/05 9:28 p.m.
                                   Re: Reprinted from my Rampancy.net posts:zugy 12/7/05 9:36 p.m.
                                   Re: Reprinted from my Rampancy.net posts:Brian Graham 12/7/05 9:42 p.m.
                                   Re: Reprinted from my Rampancy.net posts:Narcogen 12/7/05 9:56 p.m.
                                         Re: Reprinted from my Rampancy.net posts:Pak 12/7/05 10:09 p.m.
                 Comment repilesNarcogen 12/7/05 9:49 p.m.
                       Re: Comment repilesBrian Graham 12/7/05 10:09 p.m.
     I disagreeEchoes 12/7/05 4:34 p.m.
           Re: I disagreeSep7imus [subnova] 12/7/05 4:56 p.m.
                 Art...Video Games...MurderPallor [subnova] 12/7/05 5:53 p.m.
                       Welcome back. *NM*c0ld vengeance 12/7/05 6:38 p.m.
                       Re: Art...Video Games...MurderSep7imus [subnova] 12/7/05 6:47 p.m.
                             Re: Art...Video Games...Murdermad.max [subnova] 12/7/05 6:57 p.m.
                             Speeding It UpPallor [subnova] 12/7/05 7:14 p.m.
     Craftsmanshipmad.max [subnova] 12/7/05 6:43 p.m.
           Expression.Peptuck 12/7/05 7:05 p.m.
                 Re: Expression.Brian Graham 12/7/05 8:20 p.m.
                       Re: Expression.Peptuck 12/7/05 9:44 p.m.
                             Re: Expression.Louis Wu 12/8/05 9:00 a.m.
                                   Re: Expression.Malleus 12/8/05 11:27 a.m.
           Now that you've defined art and craft so wellchar 12/7/05 7:10 p.m.
                 Re: Now that you've defined art and craft so wellPeptuck 12/7/05 7:16 p.m.
           Re: CraftsmanshipPak 12/7/05 7:42 p.m.
                 My Creation.Pallor [subnova] 12/7/05 7:53 p.m.
                       Re: My Creation.Pak 12/7/05 8:52 p.m.
                             Re: My Creation.Anton P. Nym (aka Steve) 12/7/05 9:15 p.m.
                                   Hanging on my "Wall" IMGPak 12/7/05 9:25 p.m.
                                   Re: My Creation.Peptuck 12/8/05 12:21 a.m.
                       Re: My Creation.Peptuck 12/7/05 11:42 p.m.
           Craft, Art, Low Art, High Art, Pop Art, PopTartNarcogen 12/7/05 10:09 p.m.
           Re: CraftsmanshipWado SG 12/8/05 2:29 a.m.
                 Re: CraftsmanshipPak 12/8/05 3:52 p.m.
     Re: Rebuttal to Narcogen's Article on Story and Gachar 12/7/05 6:56 p.m.
           Re: Rebuttal to Narcogen's Article on Story and GaWhisp 12/7/05 7:03 p.m.
     Re: Rebuttal to Narcogen's Article on Story and GaPak 12/7/05 7:08 p.m.
     I also disagree.Shishka 12/7/05 7:33 p.m.
           Er, with Mr Graham, not Narc. *NM*Shishka 12/7/05 7:49 p.m.
           Re: I also disagree.Brian Graham 12/7/05 8:10 p.m.
                 Re: I also disagree.Pak 12/7/05 8:26 p.m.
                       Re: I also disagree.Brian Graham 12/7/05 8:35 p.m.
                             Re: I also disagree.Pak 12/7/05 8:46 p.m.
                                   Re: I also disagree.Brian Graham 12/7/05 8:57 p.m.
                                         Re: I also disagree.Pak 12/7/05 9:08 p.m.
                                         Re: I also disagree.Louis Wu 12/7/05 9:14 p.m.
                                               Re: I also disagree.Brian Graham 12/7/05 9:30 p.m.
                                                     Re: I also disagree.Anton P. Nym (aka Steve) 12/7/05 9:40 p.m.
                                                           Re: I also disagree.Pak 12/7/05 9:44 p.m.
                                                           Re: I also disagree.Brian Graham 12/7/05 9:50 p.m.
                                                                 Re: I also disagree.Pak 12/7/05 9:54 p.m.
                                                                       Re: I also disagree.Brian Graham 12/7/05 9:58 p.m.
                                                                             Re: I also disagree.Pak 12/7/05 10:07 p.m.
                                                                                   Re: I also disagree.Brian Graham 12/7/05 10:11 p.m.
                                                                                         Re: I also disagree.Pak 12/7/05 10:13 p.m.
                                                                 Re: I also disagree.Anton P. Nym (aka Steve) 12/7/05 10:15 p.m.
                                                                       Re: I also disagree.Pak 12/7/05 10:28 p.m.
                                                     Re: I also disagree.Narcogen 12/7/05 10:32 p.m.
                             Re: I also disagree.jman571 12/7/05 8:46 p.m.
                 Re: I also disagree.Shishka 12/7/05 9:54 p.m.
                 Re: I also disagree.Narcogen 12/7/05 10:22 p.m.
     Is a rose by any other name...Wado SG 12/7/05 8:28 p.m.
           Re: Is a rose by any other name...Wado SG 12/7/05 8:30 p.m.
           Re: Is a rose by any other name...Brian Graham 12/7/05 8:42 p.m.
                 Re: Is a rose by any other name...Pak 12/7/05 8:50 p.m.
                       Re: Is a rose by any other name...Brian Graham 12/7/05 9:36 p.m.
                 art is like the gum at the bottom of my shoe *NM*jman571 12/7/05 8:51 p.m.
                 Re: Is a rose by any other name...Wado SG 12/7/05 8:53 p.m.
                       the ART of War, maybe? *NM*jman571 12/7/05 9:07 p.m.
                       Re: Is a rose by any other name...Brian Graham 12/7/05 9:14 p.m.
                             Re: Is a rose by any other name...Pak 12/7/05 9:40 p.m.
                             Re: Is a rose by any other name...Wado SG 12/7/05 9:59 p.m.
                                   Re: Is a rose by any other name...Brian Graham 12/7/05 10:19 p.m.
                                         Re: Is a rose by any other name...Pak 12/7/05 10:30 p.m.
                                               Re: Is a rose by any other name...Wado SG 12/7/05 10:37 p.m.
                                         Re: Is a rose by any other name...Wado SG 12/7/05 10:36 p.m.
                                   Re: Is a rose by any other name...Pak 12/7/05 10:27 p.m.
                                         Re: Is a rose by any other name...Wado SG 12/7/05 11:07 p.m.
                                               Re: Is a rose by any other name...Pak 12/8/05 2:24 p.m.
                                                     Re: Is a rose by any other name...Wado SG 12/8/05 9:18 p.m.
     The problem with art...zugy 12/7/05 9:30 p.m.
           Re: The problem with art...Peptuck 12/7/05 9:46 p.m.
                 Isin't it ironic....jman571 12/7/05 10:14 p.m.
     Re: Rebuttal to Narcogen's Article on Story and GaBrian Graham 12/7/05 10:22 p.m.
           Re: Rebuttal to Narcogen's Article on Story and GaSep7imus [subnova] 12/7/05 10:30 p.m.
                 Re: Rebuttal to Narcogen's Article on Story and GaWado SG 12/8/05 1:59 a.m.
           Re: Rebuttal to Narcogen's Article on Story and GaPak 12/7/05 10:31 p.m.
     Re: Rebuttal to Narcogen's Article on Story and GaSep7imus [subnova] 12/7/05 10:30 p.m.
     Re: Rebuttal to Narcogen's Article on Story and GaTiny 12/7/05 11:55 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.