/-/S'pht-Translator-Active/-/

	Re: Ouch!
	Posted By: Mazilurik	Date: 6/22/02 9:13 p.m.
	In Response To: Re: Ouch! (Inverted Sock Puppet) : The US have broken Rules of Engagement by attacking a country without : declaring war. I agree that the Taliban are (for lack of a better word) : criminals, but that doesn't excuse a country to kidnap them. I'm not quite sure, but is the Taliban even considered the official government of Afghanistan? If not, then the US isn't attacking the country per se, but rather a group within it, just as attacking Al-Qaeda was attacking a group operating in Afghanistan. If, on the other hand, the Taliban is the official government rather than merely an acting government, I agree that there should have been some sort of formal declaration of war. : There is no doubt that retaliatory attacks should have been carried out : on Al-Queada targets, but the Taliban should not have been attacked unless : they attacked any US soldiers first. Also there is a difference between : providing a safe haven for terrorists and not stopping them. As far as I : can tell (I could be wrong) the Taliban just said they would not attack : Al_queda, maybe this difference is not clear in Bush's eyes, but it is in : mine. I don't know too much about the connections between the Taliban and Al-Qaeda (Middle Eastern politics tends to give me a headache), but the reason cited by Bush for the attack on the Taliban was their refusal to "Close terrorist training camps. Hand over leaders of the Al Qaeda network. And return all foreign nationals, including American citizens, unjustly detained in their country." Much as I support the Taliban being removed from power, these were not the right reasons to do it; Bush was basically saying, "If you're not with us, you're against us." Much as I hate the callousness of the Taliban towards the citizens of Afghanistan, the mere fact that the Taliban didn't particularly care whether Osama bin Laden lives or dies isn't in itself any reason to target the Taliban along with Al-Qaeda. Of course, the Taliban very well might have attacked the US troops, but perhaps it would have been better to wait for that to happen, rather than preemptively attacking the Taliban merely because of their refusal to comply with the US's demands. That said, if there is a stronger connection between the Taliban and Al-Quada none of the above applies; as I said, Middle Eastern politics isn't my area of expertise. : I cannot believe that the US attacked a country that is 2nd last in : the HDI (Human Development Index), this includes all the countries in the : world. I don't think the Taliban was helping much in this regard; I sincerely doubt that there was one person in the Taliban government who actually cared at all about the people's well-being. : PS. Don't get me started on his strike first policy. : PPS. Did you know that Bush is only the second dumbest US president (In IQ : points), make you think. That's why he's got his daddy's friends to help him. : PPPS. I don't mean for this to degenerate into a flame war. Then maybe we should stop talking about politics. ;) (Methinks we've gone a bit off topic anyway...)

[ | Message Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg ] Pre-2004 Posts

Replies:

	Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Steve Levinson	6/17/02 5:14 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Yossarian	6/17/02 8:19 p.m.
	Great references - thanks *NM*	Steve Levinson	6/17/02 10:06 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Agent Cletus	6/18/02 9:56 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Ben A. Potter	6/18/02 12:09 p.m.
	LOL, U prove my point. Cletus.	Agent Cletus	6/18/02 12:34 p.m.
	Re: LOL, U prove my point. Cletus.	Steve Levinson	6/18/02 12:58 p.m.
	So totally wrong . . .	MakeMineRed	6/18/02 1:02 p.m.
	again...	Ben A. Potter	6/19/02 1:18 p.m.
	I couldn't have said it better myself	Steve Levinson	6/18/02 12:40 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	MakeMineRed	6/18/02 12:39 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Yossarian	6/18/02 1:39 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Tru7h	6/18/02 2:34 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Yossarian	6/18/02 4:06 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Tru7h	6/18/02 7:11 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Yossarian	6/18/02 7:20 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Mazilurik	6/18/02 8:09 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Agent Cletus	6/19/02 6:29 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Steve Levinson	6/19/02 7:48 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Tru7h	6/19/02 11:59 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Yossarian	6/19/02 1:58 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Tru7h	6/19/02 6:35 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Steve Levinson	6/19/02 7:26 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Tru7h	6/20/02 9:15 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Yossarian	6/19/02 8:08 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/20/02 12:34 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Steve Levinson	6/20/02 7:30 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Tru7h	6/20/02 9:13 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Steve Levinson	6/20/02 9:35 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Tru7h	6/20/02 9:22 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/21/02 12:56 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Tru7h	6/21/02 7:14 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/22/02 1:50 a.m.
	Ouch!	Steve Levinson	6/22/02 9:23 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	:: Beer Can ::	6/22/02 12:45 p.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Tru7h	6/22/02 1:59 p.m.
	Re: Ouch!	:: Beer Can ::	6/22/02 5:36 p.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/22/02 7:40 p.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Mazilurik	6/22/02 9:13 p.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Steve Levinson	6/22/02 9:16 p.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Tru7h	6/23/02 7:18 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Steve Levinson	6/23/02 8:26 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/24/02 12:37 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	:: Beer Can ::	6/24/02 1:22 a.m.
	8^D *NM*	Steve Levinson	6/24/02 7:38 a.m.
	LOL *NM*	Tru7h	6/25/02 7:35 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Steve Levinson	6/24/02 8:01 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/25/02 12:52 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Tru7h	6/25/02 7:48 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Steve Levinson	6/25/02 8:56 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/26/02 1:16 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	:: Beer Can ::	6/26/02 2:00 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Steve Levinson	6/26/02 8:20 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	:: Beer Can ::	6/26/02 11:53 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/27/02 12:39 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Steve Levinson	6/27/02 7:51 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/28/02 5:54 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Steve Levinson	6/28/02 7:32 a.m.
	Re: Ouch!	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/30/02 5:11 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	C Lund	6/18/02 2:54 p.m.
	Perceptions of Science	Steve Levinson	6/18/02 3:13 p.m.
	My bad	Agent Cletus	6/18/02 3:45 p.m.
	Re: My bad	Steve Levinson	6/18/02 3:59 p.m.
	Re: My bad	Agent Cletus	6/18/02 5:13 p.m.
	Re: My bad	Mazilurik	6/18/02 6:47 p.m.
	Re: My bad	Tru7h	6/18/02 7:16 p.m.
	Re: My bad	Yossarian	6/18/02 7:32 p.m.
	Re: My bad	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/19/02 12:50 a.m.
	Re: My bad	Steve Levinson	6/19/02 7:50 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Steve Levinson	6/29/02 8:04 p.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/30/02 4:35 a.m.
	Re: Rubicon Volunteers - Science Stands Alone	Steve Levinson	6/30/02 2:58 p.m.
	*Slight spoiler*	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/30/02 4:48 p.m.
	Re: *Slight spoiler*	Steve Levinson	6/30/02 6:24 p.m.
	Re: *Slight spoiler*	Inverted Sock Puppet	6/30/02 7:40 p.m.

Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email maintainer@bungie.org Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12.