Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Rotations | |
Posted By: Aiden <aiden@gravitymusic.com> | Date: 12/20/99 8:08 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Rotations (btrinen) > Second I would guess that you would need a lot more than two
This certainly does pose a major problem. To maintain a stable orbit of a ring body around a Lagrange point, the orbit must remain uniform over time. Obviously after construction the object must be accelerated to speed by some sort of thruster: and for this, the twin opposing engine theory would actually hold up as long as they were precisely calabrated to fire and thrust in precise symmetry. However, space poses a negligable resistance force, especially on an object with the mass of Ring World. Therefore, if a force acted upon a localized point of the body (i.e., meteor impact) the orbit would be forced into a new kinetic orbit which was unstable, resulting in loss of pseudo-gravatic uniformity and a whole lot of structural problems. This new kinetic orbit is a lot harder to repair than creating the initial orbit from a static position. In fact, it might be impossible (definately with today's technology). A likely solution to the problem would be OMS (orbital manuvering system) engines embedded into the edges of the ring. For those unfamiliar with this system, it is found in the form of several variable force engines on different angles in the nose of the NASA space shuttle, used for controlling gimble and pitch in a microgravity environment. This, tied to a VERY complex computer system tied to a MASSIVE amount of sensors could automatically repair the orbit when acted upon by a foreign force. A more likely situation would be to pair such a system with a great deal of "planerary" defense; lasers or some sort of focused magnetic field to destroy or push away approaching bodies that could destabalize orbit. Of course, all of this should be no problem for a culture that could build a 10k km ring in the middle of nowhere, right? =) Aiden |
|
Replies: |
Human Space Capability | Napalm Loon | 12/17/99 7:33 a.m. |
...But where would they orbit? | septimus | 12/17/99 11:39 a.m. |
Re: ...But where would they orbit? | Grey | 12/17/99 12:40 p.m. |
I'm dissapointed in you guys... | Maxaminus | 12/17/99 2:05 p.m. |
Two possible definitions. | Dispatcher | 12/17/99 9:33 p.m. |
Re: I'm dissapointed in you guys... | SiliconDream =PN= | 12/17/99 9:43 p.m. |
Re: ...But where would they orbit? | Jägermeister | 12/17/99 1:22 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Mark Levin | 12/17/99 2:15 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Mage | 12/17/99 2:32 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Mark Levin | 12/17/99 2:38 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Mage | 12/17/99 4:13 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Maxaminus | 12/17/99 4:45 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Mage | 12/17/99 11:06 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Mark Levin | 12/18/99 12:42 a.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Mage | 12/18/99 11:31 a.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Mr. Eez | 12/17/99 4:27 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | MacGuyver | 12/17/99 4:49 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Mark Levin | 12/17/99 5:02 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | SiliconDream =PN= | 12/17/99 9:42 p.m. |
Uses for the Halo's axis... | Noctavis =PN= | 12/20/99 3:31 p.m. |
Stable Orbits (again) | Butcher | 12/21/99 1:36 a.m. |
Placing a satellite in the center of the Halo | Noctavis =PN= | 12/21/99 10:35 a.m. |
Re: Placing a satellite in the center of the Halo | Butcher | 12/21/99 2:33 p.m. |
Unstable orbits... Why use a halo orbit? | Noctavis =PN= | 12/21/99 6:31 p.m. |
Tides on the Halo | Butcher | 12/21/99 7:03 p.m. |
Re: Tides on the Halo | Someguy | 12/21/99 8:00 p.m. |
Re: Tides on the Halo | Butcher | 12/21/99 9:35 p.m. |
Re: soell | •Mimer | 12/25/99 3:55 p.m. |
Re: soell | Matt | 12/27/99 11:53 a.m. |
Re: soell | Daft Shadow =PN= | 12/27/99 4:11 p.m. |
Re: soell | Bachus | 12/27/99 6:50 p.m. |
Re: Unstable orbits... Why use a halo orbit? | SiliconDream =PN= | 12/21/99 11:40 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Nathan | 12/20/99 4:37 a.m. |
Re: Rotations | Forensic | 12/20/99 11:58 a.m. |
Re: Rotations | SiliconDream =PN= | 12/20/99 2:21 p.m. |
Re: Rotations | btrinen | 12/20/99 2:53 p.m. |
Gravity | SyberSmoke | 12/20/99 3:09 p.m. |
Re: Gravity | SiliconDream =PN= | 12/21/99 11:00 p.m. |
Re: Rotations | Noctavis =PN= | 12/20/99 3:11 p.m. |
Re: Rotations | Aiden | 12/20/99 8:08 p.m. |
Spin that ring | L. Tankersley ("Cap'n Carnage") | 12/20/99 5:12 p.m. |
Re: Spin that ring | Dispatcher | 12/20/99 9:43 p.m. |
Re: Spin that ring | L. Tankersley ("Cap'n Carnage") | 12/21/99 10:25 a.m. |
Re: Spin that ring | Dispatcher | 12/21/99 11:10 p.m. |
L1? or L4-5? | Oddot | 12/22/99 10:24 a.m. |
Re: L1? or L4-5? | L. Tankersley ("Cap'n Carnage") | 12/22/99 2:54 p.m. |
Q: How do you spin the Halo? | Ironfist [CMG] | 12/20/99 5:41 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Chris Huff | 12/20/99 6:59 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Ringdude | 12/20/99 7:18 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | SiliconDream =PN= | 12/21/99 11:06 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Someguy | 12/21/99 11:11 p.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | SiliconDream =PN= | 12/22/99 4:06 a.m. |
Re: Internal orbits | Thomas Magle Brodersen | 12/21/99 3:06 a.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |