glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?
Posted By: kidtsunamiDate: 2/18/10 8:15 a.m.

In Response To: Why recycle environments for multiplayer? (jazo)


Ever since this was mentioned alongside previous mentions of interesting multiplayer features that have required instructions during play tests, I have believed that AI co-op/multiplayer will become more involved.

I'm imagining that instead of just score based firefight, that maybe bungie will be adding objective based firefight, using all of the environment tagging and pathing for the AI that they already did for campaign.

I mean think about it, when they talked about the development of firefight, one of the main impetuses was the scary nature of online play deterring more casual players from pouring their time into it. Imagine what it'll be like if 3 friends can get together and play split screen one flag against a medium sized covenant squad.

Additionally, established AI content need not only be used for covenant. Imagine 4 on 4 CTF games with 3 marines added to the mix.

There are a huge amount of possibilities for what will be featured in multiplayer due to this decision. I for one am extremely excited; I'm also desperately trying to stay realistic.

Lastly, yeah, I imagine there's a solid point to be made about the efficiency of re-using work put into content generation.


Message Index




Replies:

Why recycle environments for multiplayer?jazo 2/17/10 9:19 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?pete_the_duck 2/17/10 9:39 a.m.
           Funny enough...GrimBrother One 2/17/10 9:46 a.m.
                 Re: Funny enough...jazo 2/17/10 10:40 a.m.
           Agreedjazo 2/17/10 10:46 a.m.
                 Tell that to the general audience. *NM*rolandk73 2/17/10 1:17 p.m.
                       Re: Tell that to the general audience.jazo 2/17/10 1:29 p.m.
                             Re: Tell that to the general audience.rolandk73 2/17/10 1:38 p.m.
                                   Re: Tell that to the general audience.jazo 2/17/10 1:41 p.m.
                                         Re: Tell that to the general audience.xMixMasterx 2/17/10 3:31 p.m.
                                               Re: Tell that to the general audience.Metalingus627 2/17/10 5:36 p.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 9:44 a.m.
           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 9:49 a.m.
           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?GrimBrother One 2/17/10 9:49 a.m.
                 Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Metalingus627 2/17/10 11:23 a.m.
                       Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?jazo 2/17/10 11:31 a.m.
                       Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?FyreWulff 2/17/10 12:04 p.m.
                             Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 12:25 p.m.
                                   Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 12:29 p.m.
                                         Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?FyreWulff 2/17/10 1:19 p.m.
                                               Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 1:29 p.m.
                                                     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Gravemind 2/17/10 1:39 p.m.
                                                           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?FyreWulff 2/17/10 1:48 p.m.
                                                                 Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 1:55 p.m.
                             Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Metalingus627 2/17/10 1:23 p.m.
                                   Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?bluerunner 2/17/10 2:31 p.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Bry 2/17/10 9:46 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?DrDoctor 2/17/10 10:00 a.m.
           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?jazo 2/17/10 10:35 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?FyreWulff 2/17/10 11:59 a.m.
           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?jazo 2/17/10 12:19 p.m.
                 Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Jinno 2/17/10 2:31 p.m.
     Recycling is good for the environment! *NM*urk 2/17/10 12:12 p.m.
           Zing! =) *NM*jazo 2/17/10 12:21 p.m.
           Recycling is good for the production cycle ;) *NM*Nick 2/17/10 1:13 p.m.
     I always liked when maps had story, like ChironDustbunny27 2/17/10 12:52 p.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Harmanimus 2/17/10 1:55 p.m.
           Speaking of which...rolandk73 2/17/10 2:58 p.m.
                 Re: Speaking of which...CaneCutter 2/17/10 3:56 p.m.
                       Re: Speaking of which...bluerunner 2/17/10 4:11 p.m.
                             Re: Speaking of which...Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 2/17/10 5:29 p.m.
                                   Re: Speaking of which...bluerunner 2/17/10 6:49 p.m.
                             Re: Speaking of which...CaneCutter 2/17/10 5:59 p.m.
     it costs less *NM*Hawaiian Pig 2/17/10 4:21 p.m.
     Think about it in reverse.rhubarb 2/17/10 6:33 p.m.
     A polygon saved is a polygon earned. *NM*Narcogen 2/18/10 3:57 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?kidtsunami 2/18/10 8:15 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?VAVA Mk2 2/18/10 5:52 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.