glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?
Posted By: jazo <jazo41@gmail.com>Date: 2/17/10 12:19 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer? (FyreWulff)


Good points.

After last week's BWU I'm inclined to think that the whole sandbox angle for Reach is going to be the focus for multiplayer as well. It would definitely be easier to make each multiplayer map a 'sandbox' if it wasn't wholly separate from the campaign geometry. Perhaps that will allow them more time to allow us bigger and better things to do in the Reach Forge (if there is one [though after the success of Forge in H3 I cannot see why it wouldn't be included]).

Ultimately I cannot doubt Bungie and their design choices... I have yet to be "disappointed" by a Halo game.*

*Except the decision to start with ONLY a SMG in Halo 2 multi... the frustration still lingers.

jazo.tv



Message Index




Replies:

Why recycle environments for multiplayer?jazo 2/17/10 9:19 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?pete_the_duck 2/17/10 9:39 a.m.
           Funny enough...GrimBrother One 2/17/10 9:46 a.m.
                 Re: Funny enough...jazo 2/17/10 10:40 a.m.
           Agreedjazo 2/17/10 10:46 a.m.
                 Tell that to the general audience. *NM*rolandk73 2/17/10 1:17 p.m.
                       Re: Tell that to the general audience.jazo 2/17/10 1:29 p.m.
                             Re: Tell that to the general audience.rolandk73 2/17/10 1:38 p.m.
                                   Re: Tell that to the general audience.jazo 2/17/10 1:41 p.m.
                                         Re: Tell that to the general audience.xMixMasterx 2/17/10 3:31 p.m.
                                               Re: Tell that to the general audience.Metalingus627 2/17/10 5:36 p.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 9:44 a.m.
           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 9:49 a.m.
           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?GrimBrother One 2/17/10 9:49 a.m.
                 Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Metalingus627 2/17/10 11:23 a.m.
                       Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?jazo 2/17/10 11:31 a.m.
                       Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?FyreWulff 2/17/10 12:04 p.m.
                             Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 12:25 p.m.
                                   Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 12:29 p.m.
                                         Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?FyreWulff 2/17/10 1:19 p.m.
                                               Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 1:29 p.m.
                                                     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Gravemind 2/17/10 1:39 p.m.
                                                           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?FyreWulff 2/17/10 1:48 p.m.
                                                                 Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 1:55 p.m.
                             Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Metalingus627 2/17/10 1:23 p.m.
                                   Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?bluerunner 2/17/10 2:31 p.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Bry 2/17/10 9:46 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?DrDoctor 2/17/10 10:00 a.m.
           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?jazo 2/17/10 10:35 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?FyreWulff 2/17/10 11:59 a.m.
           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?jazo 2/17/10 12:19 p.m.
                 Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Jinno 2/17/10 2:31 p.m.
     Recycling is good for the environment! *NM*urk 2/17/10 12:12 p.m.
           Zing! =) *NM*jazo 2/17/10 12:21 p.m.
           Recycling is good for the production cycle ;) *NM*Nick 2/17/10 1:13 p.m.
     I always liked when maps had story, like ChironDustbunny27 2/17/10 12:52 p.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Harmanimus 2/17/10 1:55 p.m.
           Speaking of which...rolandk73 2/17/10 2:58 p.m.
                 Re: Speaking of which...CaneCutter 2/17/10 3:56 p.m.
                       Re: Speaking of which...bluerunner 2/17/10 4:11 p.m.
                             Re: Speaking of which...Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 2/17/10 5:29 p.m.
                                   Re: Speaking of which...bluerunner 2/17/10 6:49 p.m.
                             Re: Speaking of which...CaneCutter 2/17/10 5:59 p.m.
     it costs less *NM*Hawaiian Pig 2/17/10 4:21 p.m.
     Think about it in reverse.rhubarb 2/17/10 6:33 p.m.
     A polygon saved is a polygon earned. *NM*Narcogen 2/18/10 3:57 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?kidtsunami 2/18/10 8:15 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?VAVA Mk2 2/18/10 5:52 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.