glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


Re: Funny enough...
Posted By: jazo <jazo41@gmail.com>Date: 2/17/10 10:40 a.m.

In Response To: Funny enough... (GrimBrother One)


: I've often thought about how much fun it would be to have campiagn/firefight
: battles in many of the MP spaces from H3. Imagine a multilayered battle on
: Sandbox, or Last Resort. How about taking on the Covenant in Epitaph, or
: Standoff, Or Valhalla? Yes please...

: Grim

I have had similar thoughts in the past.

I'm not totally familiar with the inner workings of game development but to me it seems like if they wanted to include a feature like this it could work regardless of whether or not the multiplayer maps were taken out of campaign.

Creating the multiplayer maps with that goal in mind from the start would feasibly allow them to add a Firefight capability. Obviously that may be easier said than done.

Perhaps it comes down to what pete_the_duck said... being more of a development priority issue and having everyone sort of working in the same space instead of harshly dividing it into Campaign / Multiplayer environments.

jazo.tv



Message Index




Replies:

Why recycle environments for multiplayer?jazo 2/17/10 9:19 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?pete_the_duck 2/17/10 9:39 a.m.
           Funny enough...GrimBrother One 2/17/10 9:46 a.m.
                 Re: Funny enough...jazo 2/17/10 10:40 a.m.
           Agreedjazo 2/17/10 10:46 a.m.
                 Tell that to the general audience. *NM*rolandk73 2/17/10 1:17 p.m.
                       Re: Tell that to the general audience.jazo 2/17/10 1:29 p.m.
                             Re: Tell that to the general audience.rolandk73 2/17/10 1:38 p.m.
                                   Re: Tell that to the general audience.jazo 2/17/10 1:41 p.m.
                                         Re: Tell that to the general audience.xMixMasterx 2/17/10 3:31 p.m.
                                               Re: Tell that to the general audience.Metalingus627 2/17/10 5:36 p.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 9:44 a.m.
           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 9:49 a.m.
           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?GrimBrother One 2/17/10 9:49 a.m.
                 Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Metalingus627 2/17/10 11:23 a.m.
                       Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?jazo 2/17/10 11:31 a.m.
                       Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?FyreWulff 2/17/10 12:04 p.m.
                             Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 12:25 p.m.
                                   Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 12:29 p.m.
                                         Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?FyreWulff 2/17/10 1:19 p.m.
                                               Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 1:29 p.m.
                                                     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Gravemind 2/17/10 1:39 p.m.
                                                           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?FyreWulff 2/17/10 1:48 p.m.
                                                                 Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Archilen 2/17/10 1:55 p.m.
                             Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Metalingus627 2/17/10 1:23 p.m.
                                   Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?bluerunner 2/17/10 2:31 p.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Bry 2/17/10 9:46 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?DrDoctor 2/17/10 10:00 a.m.
           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?jazo 2/17/10 10:35 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?FyreWulff 2/17/10 11:59 a.m.
           Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?jazo 2/17/10 12:19 p.m.
                 Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Jinno 2/17/10 2:31 p.m.
     Recycling is good for the environment! *NM*urk 2/17/10 12:12 p.m.
           Zing! =) *NM*jazo 2/17/10 12:21 p.m.
           Recycling is good for the production cycle ;) *NM*Nick 2/17/10 1:13 p.m.
     I always liked when maps had story, like ChironDustbunny27 2/17/10 12:52 p.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?Harmanimus 2/17/10 1:55 p.m.
           Speaking of which...rolandk73 2/17/10 2:58 p.m.
                 Re: Speaking of which...CaneCutter 2/17/10 3:56 p.m.
                       Re: Speaking of which...bluerunner 2/17/10 4:11 p.m.
                             Re: Speaking of which...Stephen L. (SoundEffect) 2/17/10 5:29 p.m.
                                   Re: Speaking of which...bluerunner 2/17/10 6:49 p.m.
                             Re: Speaking of which...CaneCutter 2/17/10 5:59 p.m.
     it costs less *NM*Hawaiian Pig 2/17/10 4:21 p.m.
     Think about it in reverse.rhubarb 2/17/10 6:33 p.m.
     A polygon saved is a polygon earned. *NM*Narcogen 2/18/10 3:57 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?kidtsunami 2/18/10 8:15 a.m.
     Re: Why recycle environments for multiplayer?VAVA Mk2 2/18/10 5:52 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.