![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Re: It's a death by a thousand cuts | |
Posted By: rhubarb <swiss_rc@yahoo.ca> | Date: 12/6/11 12:43 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: It's a death by a thousand cuts (Lurono) : Do you think they don't understand that their products reflect on them? Of : course they know that. Any company that produces anything knows that. You : agree that the same types of problems existed when Bungie was developing : Halo, so why is it suddenly seen as a bigger problem under 343i? The : ancillary material for Halo has generally been good quality, and it still : is. : I'm not seeing where you can say that they aren't trying to do better than
They obviously don't because errors are still being made. Frankie posted long ago on this board, in a thread about the Halo Encyclodedia, that errors were inevitable, as if there was no way to avoid them. It didn't seem to be a concern then and it doesn't look like it is now. I think everything 343i does shows the standard of care that will go into Halo 4. Would you want to buy Halo 4 if it was previewed as 'generally good'? Considering that Halo is the singular purpose of 343i, it better be a hell of a lot better that 'generally good'.
|
|
Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |