Re: gah, no...


	/-/S'pht-Translator-Active/-/

Re: gah, no...

Posted By: Frungi Date: 11/21/06 7:41 a.m.
In Response To: gah, no... (MrHen)

: The word "split" was figurative, not literal. There would be no
: splits in the timeline, and there is only ever one timeline. You #2 (using
: your numbers)
Your numbers.
: would not grow up to be You #1 because You #1 and You #2
: (adult) would have had completely different lives, experiences, memories,
: bodies, etc.
: Everything still happens in the same timeline, there is only one timeline,
: and everyone can only belong to that timeline. The events in the timeline
: change according to what the different yous do, but it is still unilinear.
: Assuming, of course, I am reading this new word correctly.
: I see multilinear as in multiple, "simultaneous" timelines that all
: co-exist next to each other and people hop around from one timeline to the
: next. There may be a "true timeline" that actually happens and
: someone who time-travels sort of switches the tracks so the true timeline
: takes a different timeline.
They all actually happen, and they’re all true. You just think the one you’re on is the “real” one because you’re on it.
: That is not what I am talking about. I am strictly describing one timeline
: and a bunch of people directly affecting that timeline.
: This is why I find time-travel discussions annoying. Everyone has their own
: set of definitions and they tend to collide.
Not definitions so much as labels, but I'm going by Forrest’s instead of making up my own (because everyone has his own), just for consistency’s sake. He actually mentioned two unilinearities: one in which everything is predestined (post-destined?) and all time travel already happened and will happen again, and the one in Back to the Future where the timeline can be changed. But you seem to be saying the three of You are three separate beings, meaning you can’t possibly all be in the same timeline, or else they’d all just be you. Either that or you all think you’re changing the one timeline, when you’re actually branching off new ones (see: quantum physics).
Anyway, wasn’t the whole point of kidnapping yourself to resolve all this? All the temporal questions would be answered with that one act, I think.

[ Post a Reply | Message Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg ]
Pre-2004 Posts

Replies:

Plotline question concerning Infinity Icarus 11/15/06 12:18 p.m.

Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity Forrest of B.org 11/15/06 1:10 p.m.

Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity RyokoTK 11/15/06 1:43 p.m.

Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity Forrest of B.org 11/15/06 3:51 p.m.

Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity Forrest of B.org 11/15/06 3:59 p.m.

time travel and plots in general MrHen 11/15/06 6:08 p.m.

Re: time travel and plots in general patrick 11/15/06 6:48 p.m.

Re: time travel and plots in general Forrest of B.org 11/15/06 7:57 p.m.

more on plot MrHen 11/16/06 5:07 a.m.

Re: more on plot Document 11/18/06 11:39 a.m.

I would not know. MrHen 11/18/06 12:33 p.m.

Re: I would not know. Document 11/18/06 12:44 p.m.

oh, okay. :) MrHen 11/18/06 3:37 p.m.

Re: oh, okay. :) thermoplyae 11/18/06 7:18 p.m.

Re: time travel and plots in general LegacyTyphoon 11/17/06 12:39 a.m.

Re: time travel Frungi 11/17/06 1:04 p.m.

Re: time travel Document 11/17/06 1:09 p.m.

Re: time travel MrHen 11/17/06 2:51 p.m.

Re: time travel Frungi 11/18/06 1:09 p.m.

Re: time travel Document 11/20/06 11:01 a.m.

well, obviously MrHen 11/20/06 12:17 p.m.

Re: well, obviously Frungi 11/20/06 5:01 p.m.

Re: well, obviously Forrest of B.org 11/20/06 6:52 p.m.

unilinear? MrHen 11/21/06 4:49 a.m.

Re: unilinear? Frungi 11/21/06 5:49 a.m.

gah, no... MrHen 11/21/06 6:21 a.m.

Re: gah, no... Frungi 11/21/06 7:41 a.m.

Re: gah, no... MrHen 11/21/06 8:25 a.m.

Hypothetical question Frungi 11/21/06 1:45 p.m.

Hypothetical answers MrHen 11/22/06 4:53 a.m.

Re: Hypothetical answers Frungi 11/22/06 4:24 p.m.

Re: Hypothetical answers MrHen 11/23/06 7:52 a.m.

Re: Hypothetical answers Frungi 11/23/06 9:11 a.m.

Re: Hypothetical answers MrHen 11/23/06 4:04 p.m.

Re: gah, no... Forrest of B.org 11/21/06 8:19 p.m.

there are no time-loops MrHen 11/22/06 4:21 a.m.

Re: unilinear? Forrest of B.org 11/21/06 8:07 p.m.

Something is wrong... MrHen 11/22/06 4:35 a.m.

Re: Something is wrong... Forrest of B.org 11/22/06 9:09 a.m.

this is awesome, I love this stuff MrHen 11/22/06 9:33 a.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff treellama 11/22/06 11:25 a.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff Forrest of B.org 11/22/06 12:00 p.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff treellama 11/22/06 2:41 p.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff Forrest of B.org 11/22/06 5:48 p.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff treellama 11/23/06 4:58 a.m.

ha, nice MrHen 11/23/06 8:05 a.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff Document 9/18/07 11:06 a.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff Forrest of B.org 11/22/06 12:28 p.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff Frungi 11/22/06 4:07 p.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff Forrest of B.org 11/22/06 6:05 p.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff Document 11/22/06 7:14 p.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff Frungi 11/22/06 7:31 p.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff Forrest of B.org 11/23/06 12:37 a.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff *LINK* Frungi 11/25/06 1:15 p.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff Forrest of B.org 11/26/06 10:04 a.m.

Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff Frungi 11/26/06 6:30 p.m.

timeline == ? MrHen 11/23/06 8:09 a.m.

agreement :) MrHen 11/23/06 8:00 a.m.

Re: Something is wrong... Aachim 11/22/06 1:24 p.m.

returning to time travel Pfhorever 11/23/06 10:13 a.m.

Re: returning to time travel Frungi 11/23/06 10:43 a.m.

Re: well, obviously Document 11/21/06 10:30 a.m.

Re: time travel Forrest of B.org 11/17/06 3:47 p.m.

Re: time travel legacytyphoon 11/17/06 8:29 p.m.

Re: time travel Document 11/17/06 9:17 p.m.

Re: time travel Frungi 11/18/06 1:07 p.m.

Re: time travel Document 11/19/06 5:59 a.m.

I disagree *LINK* MrHen 11/18/06 6:55 a.m.

Re: time travel and plots in general Frungi 11/21/06 7:48 a.m.

Re: time travel and plots in general Forrest of B.org 11/21/06 8:26 p.m.

Re: time travel and plots in general Vid Boi 11/16/06 6:18 a.m.

Re: time travel and plots in general D-M.A. 11/16/06 8:38 a.m.

Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity thermoplyae 11/15/06 2:05 p.m.

*cough* spam *cough* MrHen 11/15/06 3:35 p.m.

Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity SnowCrash 11/15/06 4:12 p.m.

Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity thermoplyae 11/15/06 5:03 p.m.

Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity kyjel 11/15/06 5:06 p.m.

Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity thermoplyae 11/15/06 6:14 p.m.

Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity Document 11/16/06 10:10 a.m.

Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity REB 11/16/06 7:31 p.m.

REB!!! *NM* ukimalefu 11/16/06 8:24 p.m.

Re: Hey, ukimalefu! *NM* REB 11/17/06 9:41 a.m.

MrHen apologized it for in his post, but thanks :) *NM* thermoplyae 11/16/06 11:27 p.m.

WMaiD Aaron Sikes 11/17/06 9:33 a.m.

Re: WMaiD kyjel 11/17/06 10:28 a.m.

It was a joke. >. *NM* MrHen 11/17/06 2:49 p.m.

Re: Got It ;-) *NM* REB 11/17/06 3:07 p.m.

WMaiD *LINK* Blayne 11/17/06 11:24 a.m.

Re: WMaiD SnowCrash 11/18/06 10:31 a.m.

Re: WMaiD Blayne 11/21/06 10:18 a.m.

Re: WMaiD Aaron Sikes 11/21/06 10:50 a.m.

Re: WMaiD Frungi 11/21/06 7:09 p.m.

[ Post a Reply | Message Index | Read Prev Msg | Read Next Msg ]
Pre-2004 Posts

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:
: Your numbers. : They all actually happen, and they’re all true. You just think the one you’re : on is the “real” one because you’re on it. : Not definitions so much as labels, but I'm going by Forrest’s instead of : making up my own (because everyone has his own), just for consistency’s : sake. He actually mentioned two unilinearities: one in which everything is : predestined (post-destined?) and all time travel already happened and will : happen again, and the one in Back to the Future where the timeline can be : changed. But you seem to be saying the three of You are three separate : beings, meaning you can’t possibly all be in the same timeline, or else : they’d all just be you. Either that or you all think you’re changing the : one timeline, when you’re actually branching off new ones (see: quantum : physics). : Anyway, wasn’t the whole point of kidnapping yourself to resolve all this? : All the temporal questions would be answered with that one act, I think.

If you'd like to include a link to another page with your message,
please provide both the URL address and the title of the page:
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:

If necessary, enter your password below:
Password:

Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email maintainer@bungie.org
Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12.

Plotline question concerning Infinity	Icarus	11/15/06 12:18 p.m.
Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity	Forrest of B.org	11/15/06 1:10 p.m.
Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity	RyokoTK	11/15/06 1:43 p.m.
Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity	Forrest of B.org	11/15/06 3:51 p.m.
Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity	Forrest of B.org	11/15/06 3:59 p.m.
time travel and plots in general	MrHen	11/15/06 6:08 p.m.
Re: time travel and plots in general	patrick	11/15/06 6:48 p.m.
Re: time travel and plots in general	Forrest of B.org	11/15/06 7:57 p.m.
more on plot	MrHen	11/16/06 5:07 a.m.
Re: more on plot	Document	11/18/06 11:39 a.m.
I would not know.	MrHen	11/18/06 12:33 p.m.
Re: I would not know.	Document	11/18/06 12:44 p.m.
oh, okay. :)	MrHen	11/18/06 3:37 p.m.
Re: oh, okay. :)	thermoplyae	11/18/06 7:18 p.m.
Re: time travel and plots in general	LegacyTyphoon	11/17/06 12:39 a.m.
Re: time travel	Frungi	11/17/06 1:04 p.m.
Re: time travel	Document	11/17/06 1:09 p.m.
Re: time travel	MrHen	11/17/06 2:51 p.m.
Re: time travel	Frungi	11/18/06 1:09 p.m.
Re: time travel	Document	11/20/06 11:01 a.m.
well, obviously	MrHen	11/20/06 12:17 p.m.
Re: well, obviously	Frungi	11/20/06 5:01 p.m.
Re: well, obviously	Forrest of B.org	11/20/06 6:52 p.m.
unilinear?	MrHen	11/21/06 4:49 a.m.
Re: unilinear?	Frungi	11/21/06 5:49 a.m.
gah, no...	MrHen	11/21/06 6:21 a.m.
Re: gah, no...	Frungi	11/21/06 7:41 a.m.
Re: gah, no...	MrHen	11/21/06 8:25 a.m.
Hypothetical question	Frungi	11/21/06 1:45 p.m.
Hypothetical answers	MrHen	11/22/06 4:53 a.m.
Re: Hypothetical answers	Frungi	11/22/06 4:24 p.m.
Re: Hypothetical answers	MrHen	11/23/06 7:52 a.m.
Re: Hypothetical answers	Frungi	11/23/06 9:11 a.m.
Re: Hypothetical answers	MrHen	11/23/06 4:04 p.m.
Re: gah, no...	Forrest of B.org	11/21/06 8:19 p.m.
there are no time-loops	MrHen	11/22/06 4:21 a.m.
Re: unilinear?	Forrest of B.org	11/21/06 8:07 p.m.
Something is wrong...	MrHen	11/22/06 4:35 a.m.
Re: Something is wrong...	Forrest of B.org	11/22/06 9:09 a.m.
this is awesome, I love this stuff	MrHen	11/22/06 9:33 a.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	treellama	11/22/06 11:25 a.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	Forrest of B.org	11/22/06 12:00 p.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	treellama	11/22/06 2:41 p.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	Forrest of B.org	11/22/06 5:48 p.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	treellama	11/23/06 4:58 a.m.
ha, nice	MrHen	11/23/06 8:05 a.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	Document	9/18/07 11:06 a.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	Forrest of B.org	11/22/06 12:28 p.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	Frungi	11/22/06 4:07 p.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	Forrest of B.org	11/22/06 6:05 p.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	Document	11/22/06 7:14 p.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	Frungi	11/22/06 7:31 p.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	Forrest of B.org	11/23/06 12:37 a.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff LINK	Frungi	11/25/06 1:15 p.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	Forrest of B.org	11/26/06 10:04 a.m.
Re: this is awesome, I love this stuff	Frungi	11/26/06 6:30 p.m.
timeline == ?	MrHen	11/23/06 8:09 a.m.
agreement :)	MrHen	11/23/06 8:00 a.m.
Re: Something is wrong...	Aachim	11/22/06 1:24 p.m.
returning to time travel	Pfhorever	11/23/06 10:13 a.m.
Re: returning to time travel	Frungi	11/23/06 10:43 a.m.
Re: well, obviously	Document	11/21/06 10:30 a.m.
Re: time travel	Forrest of B.org	11/17/06 3:47 p.m.
Re: time travel	legacytyphoon	11/17/06 8:29 p.m.
Re: time travel	Document	11/17/06 9:17 p.m.
Re: time travel	Frungi	11/18/06 1:07 p.m.
Re: time travel	Document	11/19/06 5:59 a.m.
I disagree LINK	MrHen	11/18/06 6:55 a.m.
Re: time travel and plots in general	Frungi	11/21/06 7:48 a.m.
Re: time travel and plots in general	Forrest of B.org	11/21/06 8:26 p.m.
Re: time travel and plots in general	Vid Boi	11/16/06 6:18 a.m.
Re: time travel and plots in general	D-M.A.	11/16/06 8:38 a.m.
Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity	thermoplyae	11/15/06 2:05 p.m.
cough spam cough	MrHen	11/15/06 3:35 p.m.
Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity	SnowCrash	11/15/06 4:12 p.m.
Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity	thermoplyae	11/15/06 5:03 p.m.
Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity	kyjel	11/15/06 5:06 p.m.
Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity	thermoplyae	11/15/06 6:14 p.m.
Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity	Document	11/16/06 10:10 a.m.
Re: Plotline question concerning Infinity	REB	11/16/06 7:31 p.m.
REB!!! NM	ukimalefu	11/16/06 8:24 p.m.
Re: Hey, ukimalefu! NM	REB	11/17/06 9:41 a.m.
MrHen apologized it for in his post, but thanks :) NM	thermoplyae	11/16/06 11:27 p.m.
WMaiD	Aaron Sikes	11/17/06 9:33 a.m.
Re: WMaiD	kyjel	11/17/06 10:28 a.m.
It was a joke. >. NM	MrHen	11/17/06 2:49 p.m.
Re: Got It ;-) NM	REB	11/17/06 3:07 p.m.
WMaiD LINK	Blayne	11/17/06 11:24 a.m.
Re: WMaiD	SnowCrash	11/18/06 10:31 a.m.
Re: WMaiD	Blayne	11/21/06 10:18 a.m.
Re: WMaiD	Aaron Sikes	11/21/06 10:50 a.m.
Re: WMaiD	Frungi	11/21/06 7:09 p.m.



	Your Name:
	Your E-Mail Address:
	Subject:
	Message: : Your numbers. : They all actually happen, and they’re all true. You just think the one you’re : on is the “real” one because you’re on it. : Not definitions so much as labels, but I'm going by Forrest’s instead of : making up my own (because everyone has his own), just for consistency’s : sake. He actually mentioned two unilinearities: one in which everything is : predestined (post-destined?) and all time travel already happened and will : happen again, and the one in Back to the Future where the timeline can be : changed. But you seem to be saying the three of You are three separate : beings, meaning you can’t possibly all be in the same timeline, or else : they’d all just be you. Either that or you all think you’re changing the : one timeline, when you’re actually branching off new ones (see: quantum : physics). : Anyway, wasn’t the whole point of kidnapping yourself to resolve all this? : All the temporal questions would be answered with that one act, I think.
	If you'd like to include a link to another page with your message, please provide both the URL address and the title of the page:
	Optional Link URL:
	Optional Link Title:
	If necessary, enter your password below:
	Password: