Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: also... | |
Posted By: General Battuta <seth.dickinson@gmail.com> | Date: 11/5/11 9:55 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: also... (Ibeechu) Well, you're arguing against me as a man, and I think what Jilly thinks, though - perhaps phrased in a more friendly manner, given I'm not as often forced to deal with the consequences of that kind of thought - I think you're just not willing to take a step back and consider the other side of the argument: that there is something worth looking at here. Sexism is a very real, very powerful force, especially in nerd culture, and especially in academia, where women are constantly held back by it. It pops up in strange places, and it's always worth looking for, even in yourself, or myself, or the places you work or learn. : Yes, I'm saying you're grasping at straws and forcing connections. It's fine
You're making an argument of non-falsifiability. That's fine, and it's a good argument, especially in science. But I don't think it really applies here, because we're talking about frequency patterns, not an algorithmic event in a single text. You seem to think that the blog post you read is arguing for 'malice' or some intentional discrimination against women. That's rarely true when it comes to problematic depictions of women in media. These issues usually creep in subtly, often without intent on the part of the author(s). I think you're also treating this type of analysis as if it's based on algorithmic, rule-based reasoning. It's not. When you look at the gender dynamics of a text, you're employing frequency-based reasoning -- you look for repeated patterns across a body of work. Here's an example: my friend Tamora Pierce, a best-selling author, has spent time working in comics, where she tried to foster female superheroes for young women to root for. One day, she erupted in anger over a comic book cover -- I can't remember if it was for a comic she'd written, or someone else's. It depicted a group of young female heroes in skin-tight outfits, tied to a pole, being menaced by a group of tentacles and splattered in white goo that covered them from necklines to waist. "It's a cumshot," she said. "They're just trying to sell it as tentacle porn." These patterns come up again and again in the handling of female characters, across all kinds of media. That's why the Bechdel Test, for example, works: it doesn't mean anything applied to one individual work, but when used to analyze a body of work, it has enormous power. Halo doesn't do anything nearly this gratuitous or ridiculous. But leaving a vulnerable female character to be menaced by tentacles is, absolutely, a pretty gendered move. Intentionally or not -- it's an attempt to invoke the (male, by default assumption's) fear of rape jeopardy towards their female companion. Similarly, the beat with Tartarus coercing Miranda - it's a momentary trigger of the 'oh no, they'll rape her!' jeopardy card, and then Johnson shows up to intervene. : If it's a sphincter, why can't it imply pooping? The Flood are disgusting;
You're building a straw man here. It doesn't actually matter whether the writers or male or female, since both sexes are equally capable of screwing this up. Just focus on the text itself, and set aside questions of 'did they mean to do this' and 'who did this'. That said, I don't think you can make a strong scatological argument about the flood. Nothing about them is inherently, uh, poopy? They forcibly create life by violating the bodies of other life; like Giger's alien, they're all about the rape. Besides: would making an argument that the level 'Cortana' involves a penis' journey up an anus really help your case? :P : I just do not understand this. Playing Halo 3 did not make me go, "you
Again, I think you're going off a little too strong here. First, the media that's shaped your attitudes towards men and women has NEVER made you, or anyone else, say 'that's right, women ARE weak!' The changes are much more subtle than that, often entirely unintentional. Second, the argument you're reacting to doesn't contend that Halo 3 says 'women are weak, you should think less of women.' It's more subtle than that - it points to little narrative beats or shades of perhaps-unintentional meaning that are an expression of our flawed gender system. So, for example, when Tartarus makes a rape threat towards Miranda, we understand that it is a rape threat using not logic from the 2-whateverth century setting of Halo, but from our own world, where we would expect a rape threat in that same situation. And we see - and are perhaps uncomfortable with - the way that world has shaped the narrative. Does it make sense for Tartarus to use a rape threat against Miranda? Was it used for more than a gratuitous sense of menace? We could then have a fairly reasonable discussion of those questions, without having to go off yelling about how the very idea is sexist towards men. Similarly Halo 3, which I think handles gender much less well than Halo 2. : I was quoting Freud. But I didn't want to give the impression that I think
I think our world would be very much impoverished if we weren't able to analyze text and look at what it's saying. Please don't take that analysis as some kind of direct attack on the writers. Sometimes they don't even realize what they're saying.
|
|
Replies: |
Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | ElzarTheBam | 11/4/11 6:28 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Overdoziz | 11/4/11 6:41 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | davidfuchs | 11/4/11 7:21 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Battuta | 11/4/11 9:03 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Vagueness | 11/4/11 9:54 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Battuta | 11/4/11 10:26 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Quirel | 11/4/11 12:12 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Vagueness | 11/4/11 2:35 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Battuta | 11/4/11 3:21 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | =sw=warlord | 11/4/11 8:53 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Battuta | 11/4/11 8:56 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Overdoziz | 11/5/11 6:39 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | SonofMacPhisto | 11/5/11 7:10 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Vagueness | 11/5/11 7:47 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Overdoziz | 11/5/11 8:52 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Dragonclaws | 11/7/11 9:10 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Battuta | 11/7/11 9:48 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Dragonclaws | 11/8/11 12:24 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | SonofMacPhisto | 11/8/11 10:14 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Dragonclaws | 11/8/11 4:29 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Vagueness | 11/4/11 9:49 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Louis Wu | 11/4/11 10:50 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Battuta | 11/4/11 10:53 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Louis Wu | 11/4/11 11:30 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Overdoziz | 11/4/11 12:11 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Battuta | 11/4/11 12:43 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | scarab | 11/4/11 1:08 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Beckx | 11/4/11 1:12 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Overdoziz | 11/4/11 1:19 p.m. |
Also: | Overdoziz | 11/4/11 12:14 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Battuta | 11/4/11 12:40 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Vagueness | 11/4/11 11:47 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Dragonclaws | 11/7/11 9:40 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | BanditORR | 11/4/11 10:00 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Mid7night | 11/4/11 12:18 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Ibeechu | 11/4/11 4:28 p.m. |
ell oh ell i broke the forum *NM* | Ibeechu | 11/4/11 4:30 p.m. |
That's what you get, insulting Freud! *NM* | SonofMacPhisto | 11/4/11 4:43 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Battuta | 11/4/11 5:14 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Jillybean | 11/4/11 4:49 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Miguel Chavez | 11/4/11 4:52 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Dragonclaws | 11/8/11 5:40 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Vagueness | 11/8/11 6:35 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Dragonclaws | 11/8/11 7:03 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Leviathan | 11/8/11 7:07 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Quirel | 11/8/11 11:49 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Dragonclaws | 11/9/11 12:34 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Leisandir | 11/8/11 10:39 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Jillybean | 11/9/11 1:35 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Dragonclaws | 11/9/11 1:51 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Jillybean | 11/9/11 2:03 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Quirel | 11/9/11 9:16 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | General Vagueness | 11/13/11 6:25 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Jillybean | 11/4/11 5:42 p.m. |
also... | Jillybean | 11/4/11 6:00 p.m. |
Re: also... | General Vagueness | 11/4/11 7:26 p.m. |
Re: also... | Jillybean | 11/4/11 7:37 p.m. |
Re: also... | Ibeechu | 11/4/11 7:53 p.m. |
Re: also... | Jillybean | 11/4/11 8:05 p.m. |
Re: also... | General Battuta | 11/4/11 8:22 p.m. |
Re: also... | Ibeechu | 11/4/11 10:22 p.m. |
Re: also... | General Battuta | 11/5/11 9:55 a.m. |
Re: also... | SonofMacPhisto | 11/5/11 10:47 a.m. |
HOLD THE PHONE | Jillybean | 11/5/11 1:56 p.m. |
Re: HOLD THE PHONE | Quirel | 11/5/11 3:12 p.m. |
Re: HOLD THE PHONE | Jillybean | 11/5/11 3:27 p.m. |
Re: HOLD THE PHONE | General Battuta | 11/5/11 3:39 p.m. |
Re: also... | BanditORR | 11/5/11 6:27 p.m. |
Re: also... | SonofMacPhisto | 11/5/11 7:07 p.m. |
Re: also... | BanditORR | 11/5/11 9:22 p.m. |
I don't want to get into this too much | Leisandir | 11/6/11 8:26 a.m. |
Re: I don't want to get into this too much | General Vagueness | 11/6/11 8:44 a.m. |
Re: I don't want to get into this too much | Leisandir | 11/6/11 6:30 p.m. |
Re: I don't want to get into this too much | General Vagueness | 11/7/11 9:03 a.m. |
Re: I don't want to get into this too much | Jillybean | 11/6/11 12:20 p.m. |
Re: I don't want to get into this too much | Vandle Valsher | 11/6/11 4:38 p.m. |
I think I'll simply say... | DHalo | 11/6/11 6:58 p.m. |
Re: I think I'll simply say... | Leisandir | 11/6/11 9:52 p.m. |
My final words on the topic ... for the moment | Jillybean | 11/7/11 12:31 p.m. |
Also, ignore the fact I sound like Cody here *NM* | Jillybean | 11/7/11 12:36 p.m. |
Re: My final words on the topic ... for the moment | General Vagueness | 11/7/11 1:12 p.m. |
Re: My final words on the topic ... for the moment | Jillybean | 11/7/11 1:50 p.m. |
Re: My final words on the topic ... for the moment | General Vagueness | 11/7/11 3:05 p.m. |
Re: My final words on the topic ... for the moment | Quirel | 11/7/11 7:50 p.m. |
Tab explosion *NM* | Jillybean | 11/8/11 11:36 a.m. |
Re: also... | SonofMacPhisto | 11/7/11 10:14 a.m. |
Re: also... | General Battuta | 11/7/11 6:51 p.m. |
(this is for BanditOrr) | General Battuta | 11/7/11 6:52 p.m. |
Re: also... | General Vagueness | 11/5/11 7:19 p.m. |
Re: also... | Jillybean | 11/5/11 2:04 p.m. |
Re: also... | BanditORR | 11/5/11 6:35 p.m. |
Re: also... | General Vagueness | 11/5/11 6:17 p.m. |
Re: also... | Overdoziz | 11/5/11 5:19 a.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Overdoziz | 11/4/11 7:04 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Dragonclaws | 11/7/11 2:15 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Dragonclaws | 11/7/11 2:24 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | The Loot | 11/7/11 9:31 p.m. |
Re: Feminist analysis of Halo 2 | Quirel | 11/7/11 10:53 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |