Re: Curious, re ILB canon |
Posted By: thebruce0 <thebruce@rogers.com> | Date: 11/16/11 11:32 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: Curious, re ILB canon (Quirel)
: Time travel. Didn't an entire ship get blasted back to 2004? Pardon me, but
: I'd think that would have resulted in a more advanced UNSC when the
: modern-day governments started reverse-engineering the debris.
nooooooo... nothing physical went back in time. The idea was that a wormhole-type effect occurred between the Apocalypso when the forerunner artifact was activated, and the way I tend to describe it is like stretching the AI Melissa like an elastic band through the wormhole into 2004, as long as the artifact was 'enabled'. Thus the AI here was thinly connected to the AI in 2552 - separated in a sense, effectively 'broken'. When the artifact was re-activated, the AI was returned entirely to 2552, 'made whole' again.
That's one unique element of forerunner artifacts introduced in ILB which I hope is considered in future fiction, if ILB is indeed canon.
: Also, didn't ILB have a second class of Spartan IIs? Glasslands basically
: nixed that when it revealed that Halsey killed any attempt to follow up
: the Spartan II program with a new generation of soldiers.
Not Spartan II's - James James and Gilly and some others in the story were 1.0's (theoretically, ORION program). the "1.1"s (an affectionate name, not really official) were their kids, also slightly genetically enhanced.
This is another reason I think there's some animosity to the ILB story - not enough people really know what happened or how it ties in to existing Halo canon. They grey nature of its content has always been nebulous to hardcore Halo fans I think, so it's been left on the backburner.
I'd love to see 343 somehow deal with this now official canonizing of the ILB story, and how it really fits in with the greater picture!
|
Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | Hyokin | 11/15/11 10:17 p.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | General Vagueness | 11/15/11 11:59 p.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | Hyokin | 11/16/11 12:14 a.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | Quirel | 11/16/11 1:18 a.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | Archilen | 11/16/11 3:42 a.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | Quirel | 11/16/11 11:31 a.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | Archilen | 11/16/11 2:04 p.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | Louis Wu | 11/16/11 4:29 p.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | General Vagueness | 11/16/11 5:06 p.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | Dagoonite | 11/16/11 7:31 p.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | Quirel | 11/16/11 7:54 p.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | Dagoonite | 11/16/11 9:31 p.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | Quirel | 11/16/11 8:03 p.m. |
Re: Halo: From A to Z with Frank O'Connor | scarab | 11/16/11 4:49 a.m. |
The tiny hints to the future :D | Sanjeev | 11/16/11 5:52 a.m. |
Re: The tiny hints to the future :D | scarab | 11/16/11 6:01 a.m. |
Re: The tiny hints to the future :D | Archilen | 11/16/11 6:59 a.m. |
Re: The tiny hints to the future :D | JDQuackers | 11/16/11 7:07 a.m. |
Re: The tiny hints to the future :D | Sanjeev | 11/16/11 7:36 a.m. |
Re: The tiny hints to the future :D | davidfuchs | 11/16/11 8:23 a.m. |
Re: The tiny hints to the future :D | JDQuackers | 11/16/11 8:52 a.m. |
Re: The tiny hints to the future :D | Postmortem | 11/16/11 2:26 p.m. |
Re: The tiny hints to the future :D | Ibeechu | 11/16/11 7:14 p.m. |
Re: The tiny hints to the future :D | Quirel | 11/16/11 7:19 p.m. |
Re: The tiny hints to the future :D | Postmortem | 11/16/11 7:53 p.m. |
Re: The tiny hints to the future :D | General Vagueness | 11/16/11 9:58 p.m. |
OMG ITS UNICRON!!!!!! CALLING IT NOW. *NM* | Revenant1988 | 11/16/11 10:38 a.m. |
Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/16/11 8:43 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | SirPwn4g3 | 11/16/11 8:54 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | davidfuchs | 11/16/11 10:06 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/16/11 10:22 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | davidfuchs | 11/16/11 10:43 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/16/11 10:55 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | Quirel | 11/16/11 10:56 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/16/11 11:32 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | General Vagueness | 11/16/11 5:03 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | Dagoonite | 11/16/11 7:37 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | General Vagueness | 11/16/11 10:21 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/17/11 10:07 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | The Loot | 11/17/11 6:44 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/19/11 5:55 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | Dragonclaws | 11/19/11 7:14 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/19/11 9:42 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/17/11 9:23 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | General Vagueness | 11/21/11 3:43 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | Dragonclaws | 11/21/11 9:08 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/22/11 8:52 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | General Vagueness | 11/22/11 7:36 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/23/11 8:48 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | General Vagueness | 11/28/11 11:29 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/28/11 1:45 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | The Loot | 11/21/11 9:38 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | Dragonclaws | 11/19/11 7:24 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 11/19/11 10:40 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | davidfuchs | 11/19/11 11:51 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/20/11 10:41 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | The Loot | 11/20/11 11:31 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/21/11 9:08 a.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | Dragonclaws | 11/21/11 1:05 p.m. |
Re: Curious, re ILB canon | thebruce0 | 11/28/11 9:46 a.m. |
Great vid! Thanks, Frank! | The Lionheart | 11/16/11 11:37 a.m. |
LOL@comment: Wtf, this guy ain't Steve Austin! =D *NM* | cardo 8 atl | 11/16/11 2:35 p.m. |