Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Deaths? | |
| Posted By: Wayward Spleen™ | Date: 10/6/10 8:27 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: Why arena ranking promotes selfish play (JonnyOThan) : For purposes of arena rating, assists and kills are rewarded equally. Deaths (actively giving the other team a point) doesn't seem to be weighted heavily enough, and I'll provide a few game stats to illustrate.
Game 1: Rating, Kills, Assists, Deaths, Spread.
It would appear that giving the other team 6 points as opposed to 16 isn't weighted appropriately. +10 (more kills in spread), +2 more assists is only ~90 points worth of rating? I would respectfully disagree - it's the one thing that stood out like a sore thumb about the Arena math post - dying isn't punished enough/not-dying is not rewarded enough. Game 2: Rating, Kills, Assists, Deaths, Spread.
Similar situation only this time, i did not lead in kills. Game 3: Rating, Kills, Assists, Deaths, Spread. Me): 1522, 15, 0, 4, +11
I grant that I had zero assists in the match, however I maintain that a larger spread (or even least deaths by far) should have a much meatier rating attached to it as it is actively denying the other team points (through refusal to die). Thoughts?
| |
|
| Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |