glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


Re: Lol you're funny
Posted By: Lord Osiris <justin.azevedo20@gmail.com>Date: 10/29/09 5:25 a.m.

In Response To: Re: Lol you're funny (Avateur)


: Pretty much what I'm saying is that until 343 actually starts producing its
: own games, whatever Bungie has done is canon and should remain as canon
: after the fact (unless things are changed in a logical, reasonable
: manner--which then leads to what is logical and reasonable. See two
: sentences down). That's why I said in an earlier post that we may have to
: break things into "Bungie Canon" and "Microsoft Canon"
: depending on how conflicting each is with one another. If 343 goes and
: makes Halo 4 and Master Chief is suddenly named George and is Spartan-999,
: then we would obviously have an extreme issue regarding what's already
: "set in stone" and what they did with it. I feel that Halo Wars
: conflicts with many things, and considers events like slipspace travel to
: be instant and even appears to portray them as such.
I guess I misunderstood, then. I pretty much completely agree with the fact that everything Bungie does is, and always should be, considered canon. I just think that there is a logical explanation in "new" canon for the things in Halo Wars you are describing, and while some things could appear to people as non-canon, I think that we just kind of have to assume it is canon until told otherwise, because we don't know for sure. But I see why someone would not accept this.

: Not even the turret, but the missile pod and Spartan Laser. I love using
: those things as an ODST, and they definitely added to the fun. NMPD is a
: prime example of that stuff. "For fun" can be a very good
: reason. You're also forgetting that I can flip Elephants and Scorpions as
: Master Chief, and that I can flip Scorpions as ODSTs as well. Gameplay
: doesn't equate to canon in every instance.
The missile pod is an interesting case. Due to the little it appears in campaign (I think 2 levels in H3 and 1 in ODST?) It's hard to make a overall decision on if it is acceptable for the ODST to be able to pick it up in my eyes. As for the Laser, I don't see any problem for a marine to hold it. It is just as large as a rocket launcher, and probably weighs less. And I don't like how we can flip vehicles as an ODST with the same ease as a Spartan. As an ODST, if a tank flips, you should be fucked. The Warthog, If all three ODST's/Marines did a cool little animation to pick it up, I could believe that. And as for the elephant, I think the message that appears speaks for itself. I understand based on the game engine it has to be able to do that, but I would have liked to see a Mako-type ability to stay upright the whole time. It would just make more sense.

: And here's the tricky part of my argument and yours. I agree with you when it
: comes to the fact that the IP is now owned by Microsoft, but the fact that
: Bungie is still making Halo games says that they still are the authority
: in the Greater Halo Universe. H1-H3 was set in stone by them. ODST? Them.
: Reach? Them. Sure, MS owns the IP, but until that torch has been handed
: off to 343 officially, I feel that Halo Wars and many other non-Bungie
: items can be highly scrutinized and even disregarded as canon depending on
: just how many errors there are. I have extreme faith in Frankie and 343,
: but wouldn't it suck if Bungie made Reach, didn't tell Frankie or anyone
: at 343 what they had planned, and then 343 released a game a year later
: that completely contradicted many events Bungie portrayed? I would have to
: say that 343's would be entirely discounted.
I agree with all of this but the word "disregarded". I think that enough care was put into the game to pretty much guarantee that that nothing would have to be thrown out, but not everything is scrutinizing-proof (that is really a stretch to make a word there,) just like there are some confusing aspects in H1-3 + ODST.

: Naturally this won't happen, but if in the future 343 were to make a game,
: and within that game they decided they really hated some of Bungie's
: decisions in prior games (and thus decided to retcon big time), I'd either
: discount it all or call it "Microsoft Canon" now that Bungie is
: officially out of the "Halo Game Business" and on to their new
: IP. Frankie and 343 will have their chance to shine (or flicker out of
: existence), but until Bungie backs away from kicking so much ass and
: setting the standard (and the canon), regardless of who owned what as of
: when, the story is set by Bungie.
Ok, I see what you are getting at there. But I don't believe MS/343 will get rid of any Bungie canon, so I don't think we have to worry about it.

B.net Profile



Message Index




Replies:

Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingrolandk73 10/28/09 4:27 p.m.
     Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingsharpsniper99 10/28/09 4:42 p.m.
           Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingrolandk73 10/28/09 4:45 p.m.
                 Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingSonofMacPhisto 10/28/09 4:50 p.m.
                       Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingBry 10/28/09 5:07 p.m.
                             Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingbluerunner 10/28/09 6:43 p.m.
                                   Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingGeneral Vagueness 10/28/09 7:00 p.m.
                                         Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingStephen L. (SoundEffect) 10/28/09 8:29 p.m.
                                               Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingSilent Knight 10/29/09 6:43 a.m.
                                         Me too!!! *NM*mendicantbias00 11/3/09 1:23 p.m.
           Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingFyreWulff 10/28/09 9:39 p.m.
     Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingYNation913 10/28/09 4:46 p.m.
           Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingrolandk73 10/28/09 4:50 p.m.
                 Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingYNation913 10/28/09 4:54 p.m.
     Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonLord Osiris 10/28/09 7:56 p.m.
           Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonCody Miller 10/28/09 9:11 p.m.
                 Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonCasimir 10/28/09 9:50 p.m.
                 Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonThorsHammer 10/29/09 9:12 a.m.
                 Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonGeneral Vagueness 10/29/09 10:36 a.m.
                       Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonLouis Wu 10/29/09 11:31 a.m.
                             Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonCody Miller 10/29/09 11:35 a.m.
                             Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonGeneral Vagueness 10/29/09 12:30 p.m.
                                   Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonThorsHammer 10/30/09 9:03 a.m.
                                         Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonGeneral Vagueness 10/30/09 9:32 a.m.
                                               Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonThorsHammer 11/1/09 4:08 p.m.
                 Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonMiguel Chavez 10/31/09 1:29 p.m.
                       Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonYNation913 10/31/09 4:24 p.m.
                             Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonOmega 11/1/09 12:57 a.m.
                                   Thank you!Miguel Chavez 11/2/09 12:49 p.m.
                       Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonCody Miller 11/2/09 1:00 p.m.
                             Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonGeneral Vagueness 11/2/09 1:21 p.m.
                                   Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonEiii 11/2/09 4:52 p.m.
                             Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonLeviathan 11/2/09 1:34 p.m.
                                   Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonStephen L. (SoundEffect) 11/2/09 2:46 p.m.
                 Re: Halo Wars=NOT a Bad Game, COMPLETELY CanonAndrew Nagy 11/1/09 4:17 p.m.
           Lol you're funnyAvateur 10/28/09 10:12 p.m.
                 Re: Lol you're funnyLord Osiris 10/28/09 11:48 p.m.
                       Re: Lol you're funnyAvateur 10/29/09 2:22 a.m.
                             Re: Lol you're funnyLord Osiris 10/29/09 3:49 a.m.
                                   Re: Lol you're funnyAvateur 10/29/09 4:26 a.m.
                                         Re: Lol you're funnyLord Osiris 10/29/09 5:25 a.m.
                                   Re: Lol you're funnyBry 10/29/09 4:33 a.m.
                                         Re: Lol you're funnyAvateur 10/29/09 5:25 a.m.
                                               Re: Lol you're funnyBry 10/29/09 8:30 a.m.
                                                     Re: Lol you're funnyAvateur 10/29/09 2:56 p.m.
                                   Re: Lol you're funnyBernard Strauss 10/29/09 11:57 a.m.
                 Re: Lol you're funnyFrankie 10/29/09 3:36 p.m.
                       Re: Lol you're funnyGeneral Vagueness 10/29/09 4:01 p.m.
                             Re: Lol you're funnyPhoenix_9286 10/29/09 5:51 p.m.
                       Re: Lol you're funnyYNation913 10/29/09 6:04 p.m.
                       Re: Lol you're funnyAvateur 10/29/09 9:17 p.m.
                       When life gives you canon, make cannonadeNarcogen 10/29/09 10:55 p.m.
                             Re: When life gives you canon, make cannonadeStephen L. (SoundEffect) 10/30/09 6:40 a.m.
                                   BUT MAKE SURE THE CANNONADE IS SWEET. PLZ.AngelicLionheart 11/3/09 6:20 p.m.
     Re: Why Halo Wars being bad is a wonderful thingreprobate 10/29/09 1:10 a.m.
     But Halo Wars Isn't Bad... *NM*Morpheus 10/29/09 12:28 p.m.
     Halo Wars is not a Halo Game. Move along people *NM*MasterChief2829 11/1/09 1:33 a.m.
           Of course it is. *NM*Ragashingo 11/1/09 1:02 a.m.
                 Really? This Again?Lord Osiris 11/1/09 1:40 a.m.
                 rabble rabble rabbleZaneZavin 11/1/09 1:42 a.m.
           Troll *NM*Metalingus627 11/1/09 3:25 a.m.
           QQ moar. *NM*Anton P. Nym (aka Steve) 11/1/09 9:22 a.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.