Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | |
Posted By: Gravemind <kuukan_no_kage@yahoo.com> | Date: 10/21/09 4:24 p.m. |
In Response To: Nothing should be considered canon (Avateur) : Because someone always comes along and uses the fact that someone's voice : changed or the fact that a weapon became balanced as an entire reason to : try and discount everything else within a single game or multiple games : that followed it. So yeah. Bungie just basically made a bunch of crap and : it's all crap and that's why it's crap. Though I believe that the Arbiter : molesting Master Chief in the bathroom story has some extreme potential : that we may need to consider using as official canon. I think you're overreacting to other people's supposed overreactions. While I do find the inconsistencies between the game's arsenals annoying, I don't consider whole games non-canonical because the weapons are different from previous portrayals. However, for you to state "nothing should be considered canon," which is the polar opposite of "they changed some minor thing, so the whole game isn't canon," is just as wrong of a stance to take. If there are blantant, major story retcons, that just smacks of bad or lazy writing. We can gloss over minor details like weapons, but when multiple, major story elements — dates, events, character portrayals — don't match up, then something is wrong. While demanding 100% complete consistency down to the smallest details is going a bit overboard, so is simply excusing even the most gross violations of continuity just because you got pissed at someone else's complaints.
|
|
Replies: |
Should Gameplay be considered Canon? | Riceatron | 10/20/09 10:29 p.m. |
Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon? | General Vagueness | 10/20/09 11:11 p.m. |
Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon? | General Vagueness | 10/20/09 11:21 p.m. |
Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon? | Narcogen | 10/20/09 11:24 p.m. |
Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon? | Leviathan | 10/21/09 12:26 a.m. |
Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon? | Narcogen | 10/21/09 4:15 a.m. |
Re: Turrets | JonnyOThan | 10/21/09 12:41 p.m. |
Re: Turrets | Gilver | 10/21/09 1:08 p.m. |
Re: Turrets | Anton P. Nym (aka Steve) | 10/21/09 1:19 p.m. |
Re: Turrets | Gilver | 10/21/09 1:42 p.m. |
Re: Turrets | SonofMacPhisto | 10/21/09 2:13 p.m. |
Re: Turrets | Anton P. Nym (aka Steve) | 10/21/09 2:23 p.m. |
Re: Turrets | SonofMacPhisto | 10/21/09 3:28 p.m. |
Re: Turrets | Gilver | 10/21/09 4:56 p.m. |
Re: Turrets | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 10/21/09 4:11 p.m. |
Re: Turrets | FyreWulff | 10/21/09 5:52 p.m. |
Re: Turrets | SonofMacPhisto | 10/21/09 6:09 p.m. |
Re: Turrets | Narcogen | 10/22/09 2:40 a.m. |
Re: Turrets | Avateur | 10/22/09 2:59 a.m. |
Re: Turrets | Narcogen | 10/22/09 8:30 a.m. |
Sure. | serpx | 10/20/09 11:52 p.m. |
Nothing should be considered canon | Avateur | 10/21/09 12:46 a.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Narcogen | 10/21/09 4:16 a.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Avateur | 10/21/09 4:29 a.m. |
Agreed | yakaman | 10/21/09 7:58 a.m. |
Amen. *NM* | SonofMacPhisto | 10/21/09 8:15 a.m. |
Re: Agreed | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 10/21/09 8:29 a.m. |
Re: Agreed | Jillybean | 10/21/09 8:50 a.m. |
Re: Agreed | Avateur | 10/21/09 12:01 p.m. |
Without reading the thread fully... | sharpsniper99 | 10/21/09 6:03 p.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Anton P. Nym (aka Steve) | 10/21/09 11:49 a.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | The BS Police | 10/21/09 11:16 a.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | General Vagueness | 10/21/09 11:45 a.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | The BS Police | 10/21/09 11:58 a.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Avateur | 10/21/09 12:04 p.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Riceatron | 10/21/09 1:44 p.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Hikaru-119 | 10/21/09 2:42 p.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Avateur | 10/21/09 7:08 p.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Riceatron | 10/21/09 10:10 p.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Gravemind | 10/21/09 4:24 p.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | General Vagueness | 10/21/09 6:53 p.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Avateur | 10/21/09 7:11 p.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Gravemind | 10/21/09 8:24 p.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Avateur | 10/21/09 8:28 p.m. |
Re: Nothing should be considered canon | Gravemind | 10/21/09 8:22 p.m. |
Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon? | Cody Miller | 10/21/09 1:56 a.m. |
Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon? | Avateur | 10/21/09 2:30 a.m. |
Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon? | Narcogen | 10/21/09 4:17 a.m. |
Gameplay is never canon *SP* | Metalingus627 | 10/21/09 3:45 a.m. |
Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon? | Archilen | 10/21/09 4:24 a.m. |
Question... | stan | 10/21/09 9:07 a.m. |
Follow up... | stan | 10/21/09 9:09 a.m. |
Fully agree *NM* *NM* | Avateur | 10/21/09 12:06 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |