glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


Should Gameplay be considered Canon?
Posted By: Riceatron <Riceatron@hotmail.com>Date: 10/20/09 10:29 p.m.


Lets look at Halo 1.
Due to not having a focus on Multiplayer, everything was perfect.
Nothing was adjusted.

But when Halo 2 and 3 came out, the multiplayer was more a focus, and thus weapons were introduced and adjusted to fit with a 16 player match.

In Halo 3, we have detachable turrets, and it makes a SPARTAN move slow, but that is really ONLY because of the balancing of gameplay.

In 1, the Shotgun worked like a real shotgun, you could fire it off from a good 10 yards away and still kill something.
But in 2 and 3, due to Multiplayer, it was shortened and made useless except when you're in melee range.

What in gameplay can we take as Canon outside of Halo 1.

In my opinion, the only thing we can consider canon is Halo 1 Gameplay, Books, Media like Legends, Cutscenes, and Scripted Dialogue

Message Index



Replies:

Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Riceatron 10/20/09 10:29 p.m.
     Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?General Vagueness 10/20/09 11:11 p.m.
     Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?General Vagueness 10/20/09 11:21 p.m.
     Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Narcogen 10/20/09 11:24 p.m.
           Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Leviathan 10/21/09 12:26 a.m.
                 Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Narcogen 10/21/09 4:15 a.m.
           Re: TurretsJonnyOThan 10/21/09 12:41 p.m.
                 Re: TurretsGilver 10/21/09 1:08 p.m.
                       Re: TurretsAnton P. Nym (aka Steve) 10/21/09 1:19 p.m.
                             Re: TurretsGilver 10/21/09 1:42 p.m.
                                   Re: TurretsSonofMacPhisto 10/21/09 2:13 p.m.
                                         Re: TurretsAnton P. Nym (aka Steve) 10/21/09 2:23 p.m.
                                               Re: TurretsSonofMacPhisto 10/21/09 3:28 p.m.
                                                     Re: TurretsGilver 10/21/09 4:56 p.m.
                 Re: TurretsStephen L. (SoundEffect) 10/21/09 4:11 p.m.
                 Re: TurretsFyreWulff 10/21/09 5:52 p.m.
                       Re: TurretsSonofMacPhisto 10/21/09 6:09 p.m.
                 Re: TurretsNarcogen 10/22/09 2:40 a.m.
                       Re: TurretsAvateur 10/22/09 2:59 a.m.
                             Re: TurretsNarcogen 10/22/09 8:30 a.m.
     Sure.serpx 10/20/09 11:52 p.m.
           Nothing should be considered canonAvateur 10/21/09 12:46 a.m.
                 Re: Nothing should be considered canonNarcogen 10/21/09 4:16 a.m.
                       Re: Nothing should be considered canonAvateur 10/21/09 4:29 a.m.
                             Agreedyakaman 10/21/09 7:58 a.m.
                                   Amen. *NM*SonofMacPhisto 10/21/09 8:15 a.m.
                                   Re: AgreedStephen L. (SoundEffect) 10/21/09 8:29 a.m.
                                         Re: AgreedJillybean 10/21/09 8:50 a.m.
                                               Re: AgreedAvateur 10/21/09 12:01 p.m.
                                                     Without reading the thread fully...sharpsniper99 10/21/09 6:03 p.m.
                             Re: Nothing should be considered canonAnton P. Nym (aka Steve) 10/21/09 11:49 a.m.
                 Re: Nothing should be considered canonThe BS Police 10/21/09 11:16 a.m.
                       Re: Nothing should be considered canonGeneral Vagueness 10/21/09 11:45 a.m.
                             Re: Nothing should be considered canonThe BS Police 10/21/09 11:58 a.m.
                                   Re: Nothing should be considered canonAvateur 10/21/09 12:04 p.m.
                                         Re: Nothing should be considered canonRiceatron 10/21/09 1:44 p.m.
                                               Re: Nothing should be considered canonHikaru-119 10/21/09 2:42 p.m.
                                               Re: Nothing should be considered canonAvateur 10/21/09 7:08 p.m.
                                                     Re: Nothing should be considered canonRiceatron 10/21/09 10:10 p.m.
                 Re: Nothing should be considered canonGravemind 10/21/09 4:24 p.m.
                       Re: Nothing should be considered canonGeneral Vagueness 10/21/09 6:53 p.m.
                             Re: Nothing should be considered canonAvateur 10/21/09 7:11 p.m.
                                   Re: Nothing should be considered canonGravemind 10/21/09 8:24 p.m.
                                         Re: Nothing should be considered canonAvateur 10/21/09 8:28 p.m.
                             Re: Nothing should be considered canonGravemind 10/21/09 8:22 p.m.
     Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Cody Miller 10/21/09 1:56 a.m.
           Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Avateur 10/21/09 2:30 a.m.
           Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Narcogen 10/21/09 4:17 a.m.
     Gameplay is never canon *SP*Metalingus627 10/21/09 3:45 a.m.
     Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Archilen 10/21/09 4:24 a.m.
     Question...stan 10/21/09 9:07 a.m.
           Follow up...stan 10/21/09 9:09 a.m.
                 Fully agree *NM* *NM*Avateur 10/21/09 12:06 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.