glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?
Posted By: General Vagueness <General.Vagueness@gmail.com>Date: 10/20/09 11:21 p.m.

In Response To: Should Gameplay be considered Canon? (Riceatron)


: In 1, the Shotgun worked like a real shotgun, you could fire it off from a
: good 10 yards away and still kill something.
: But in 2 and 3, due to Multiplayer, it was shortened and made useless except
: when you're in melee range.

I've heard things about it being unrealistically overpowered but not knowing all that much about the mechanics of shotguns I can't make a very informed statement on it-- I can say that carrying 60 3.5 inch shells seems absurd though, and point out how you could use the pistol and sniper rifle to increase the accuracy of weapons as illustrated on Bad Cyborg-- in real life you could do that a little but not with the pinpoint precision you get in the first Halo switching from the sniper rifle to the plasma pistol.

You cannot fall off the floor.


Message Index



Replies:

Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Riceatron 10/20/09 10:29 p.m.
     Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?General Vagueness 10/20/09 11:11 p.m.
     Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?General Vagueness 10/20/09 11:21 p.m.
     Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Narcogen 10/20/09 11:24 p.m.
           Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Leviathan 10/21/09 12:26 a.m.
                 Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Narcogen 10/21/09 4:15 a.m.
           Re: TurretsJonnyOThan 10/21/09 12:41 p.m.
                 Re: TurretsGilver 10/21/09 1:08 p.m.
                       Re: TurretsAnton P. Nym (aka Steve) 10/21/09 1:19 p.m.
                             Re: TurretsGilver 10/21/09 1:42 p.m.
                                   Re: TurretsSonofMacPhisto 10/21/09 2:13 p.m.
                                         Re: TurretsAnton P. Nym (aka Steve) 10/21/09 2:23 p.m.
                                               Re: TurretsSonofMacPhisto 10/21/09 3:28 p.m.
                                                     Re: TurretsGilver 10/21/09 4:56 p.m.
                 Re: TurretsStephen L. (SoundEffect) 10/21/09 4:11 p.m.
                 Re: TurretsFyreWulff 10/21/09 5:52 p.m.
                       Re: TurretsSonofMacPhisto 10/21/09 6:09 p.m.
                 Re: TurretsNarcogen 10/22/09 2:40 a.m.
                       Re: TurretsAvateur 10/22/09 2:59 a.m.
                             Re: TurretsNarcogen 10/22/09 8:30 a.m.
     Sure.serpx 10/20/09 11:52 p.m.
           Nothing should be considered canonAvateur 10/21/09 12:46 a.m.
                 Re: Nothing should be considered canonNarcogen 10/21/09 4:16 a.m.
                       Re: Nothing should be considered canonAvateur 10/21/09 4:29 a.m.
                             Agreedyakaman 10/21/09 7:58 a.m.
                                   Amen. *NM*SonofMacPhisto 10/21/09 8:15 a.m.
                                   Re: AgreedStephen L. (SoundEffect) 10/21/09 8:29 a.m.
                                         Re: AgreedJillybean 10/21/09 8:50 a.m.
                                               Re: AgreedAvateur 10/21/09 12:01 p.m.
                                                     Without reading the thread fully...sharpsniper99 10/21/09 6:03 p.m.
                             Re: Nothing should be considered canonAnton P. Nym (aka Steve) 10/21/09 11:49 a.m.
                 Re: Nothing should be considered canonThe BS Police 10/21/09 11:16 a.m.
                       Re: Nothing should be considered canonGeneral Vagueness 10/21/09 11:45 a.m.
                             Re: Nothing should be considered canonThe BS Police 10/21/09 11:58 a.m.
                                   Re: Nothing should be considered canonAvateur 10/21/09 12:04 p.m.
                                         Re: Nothing should be considered canonRiceatron 10/21/09 1:44 p.m.
                                               Re: Nothing should be considered canonHikaru-119 10/21/09 2:42 p.m.
                                               Re: Nothing should be considered canonAvateur 10/21/09 7:08 p.m.
                                                     Re: Nothing should be considered canonRiceatron 10/21/09 10:10 p.m.
                 Re: Nothing should be considered canonGravemind 10/21/09 4:24 p.m.
                       Re: Nothing should be considered canonGeneral Vagueness 10/21/09 6:53 p.m.
                             Re: Nothing should be considered canonAvateur 10/21/09 7:11 p.m.
                                   Re: Nothing should be considered canonGravemind 10/21/09 8:24 p.m.
                                         Re: Nothing should be considered canonAvateur 10/21/09 8:28 p.m.
                             Re: Nothing should be considered canonGravemind 10/21/09 8:22 p.m.
     Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Cody Miller 10/21/09 1:56 a.m.
           Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Avateur 10/21/09 2:30 a.m.
           Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Narcogen 10/21/09 4:17 a.m.
     Gameplay is never canon *SP*Metalingus627 10/21/09 3:45 a.m.
     Re: Should Gameplay be considered Canon?Archilen 10/21/09 4:24 a.m.
     Question...stan 10/21/09 9:07 a.m.
           Follow up...stan 10/21/09 9:09 a.m.
                 Fully agree *NM* *NM*Avateur 10/21/09 12:06 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.