Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
In response to the article | |
Posted By: Dustbunny27 | Date: 10/3/09 4:49 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: lol feminism (Eiii) I put this in the comments, but I kinda doubt it will be approved, so here it is. I have to disagree with you on two points, Dare being weak, and Dare being a sex object. First we will tackle the sex object. First off, she isn't sexualized, at all. She isn't pretty, and never once in the game is put in a position where the game focuses on her body (unlike some cases with Cortana). There is one person who makes the comment of looking at her body, Romeo, and he is a stereotype male chauvinist, who is hated by pretty much everyone, and is even the weak person of the group (he is the only one to come out harmed, of the ODST's). So not only is Dare not a sexual object to the player, she isn't one to any body ingame (besides Romeo), heck Bungie basically punishes the only person who does. Next part, Dare isn't strong? How is she a Damsel in distress? She landed in the middle of covenant activity, on the low ground, without cover. Statistically, backup from a force of people who have equal cover is the smart way to survive, especially since she was the most important member of her team. Not only did she then leave the area, she managed to cover a huge area of covenant enforced ground and continue the mission. Everyone else arrives at her "rescue" to late and find out she did everything by herself. There are other points I could go on about, most of her heat from the team comes from the fact she is in ONI (which you won't understand unless you read some other material dealing with the Halo Universe). The deal with Sgt. Johnson (he is actually a lot more powerful then the games give him credit for). I do agree with you on the point of the Rookie's sex, it should have been left up to the player, for two reasons: 1) The game would not have changed depending on the gender. 2) Customizing is fun, and a better way to get incorporated into a character.
|
|
Replies: |
lol feminism | Cody Miller | 10/2/09 12:03 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | Eiii | 10/2/09 12:34 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | Phat Bob | 10/2/09 12:48 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | slothboy | 10/2/09 12:56 p.m. |
Dude | Jillybean | 10/2/09 12:59 p.m. |
Beat me to it | Eiii | 10/2/09 1:00 p.m. |
Re: Dude | slothboy | 10/2/09 1:08 p.m. |
Re: Dude | Eiii | 10/2/09 1:10 p.m. |
Re: Dude | slothboy | 10/2/09 1:19 p.m. |
Re: Dude | Bry | 10/2/09 1:22 p.m. |
Re: Dude | Eiii | 10/2/09 1:25 p.m. |
Re: Dude | slothboy | 10/2/09 1:33 p.m. |
Re: Dude | Bry | 10/2/09 2:12 p.m. |
Does anybody like Miranda? *NM* | scarab | 10/3/09 6:24 a.m. |
Re: Dude | kanbo | 10/2/09 3:09 p.m. |
This is a good post | Miguel Chavez | 10/2/09 11:48 p.m. |
Her leader power is frigidity! Nuff Said *NM* | scarab | 10/3/09 6:25 a.m. |
Dude where's my AI | Narcogen | 10/2/09 9:36 p.m. |
This is a good post | Miguel Chavez | 10/2/09 11:48 p.m. |
I agree | Jillybean | 10/3/09 4:38 a.m. |
Re: Excellently put | ThorsHammer | 10/3/09 10:30 a.m. |
In response to the article | Dustbunny27 | 10/3/09 4:49 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | slothboy | 10/2/09 12:51 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism *poss SP | Bry | 10/2/09 1:04 p.m. |
But she needed help! That's weak! *NM* | Eiii | 10/2/09 1:12 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | kanbo | 10/2/09 12:54 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | slothboy | 10/2/09 12:58 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | Dojorkan | 10/2/09 1:32 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | General Vagueness | 10/2/09 12:57 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | Captain Spark | 10/2/09 1:01 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | Jillybean | 10/2/09 1:11 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | Eiii | 10/2/09 1:24 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | Jillybean | 10/2/09 1:31 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | Eiii | 10/2/09 2:05 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | General Vagueness | 10/2/09 2:22 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | kanbo | 10/2/09 3:12 p.m. |
Can't rape what isn't there! *NM* | Eiii | 10/2/09 3:40 p.m. |
Re: Can't rape what isn't there! | Hawaiian Pig | 10/2/09 4:55 p.m. |
Re: Can't rape what isn't there! | Ze Moose | 10/2/09 5:31 p.m. |
Re: Can't rape what isn't there! | Jillybean | 10/2/09 6:37 p.m. |
Re: Can't rape what isn't there! | Hawaiian Pig | 10/2/09 6:57 p.m. |
Re: Can't rape what isn't there! | Jillybean | 10/2/09 7:07 p.m. |
Re: Can't rape what isn't there! | ThorsHammer | 10/3/09 11:05 a.m. |
Re: lol feminism | Captain Spark | 10/2/09 2:32 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | Miguel Chavez | 10/2/09 4:18 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | General Vagueness | 10/2/09 4:48 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | Captain Spark | 10/2/09 6:17 p.m. |
Re: END THIS THREAD PLEASE | Hedgemony | 10/2/09 6:36 p.m. |
Re: END THIS THREAD PLEASE | Eiii | 10/2/09 7:09 p.m. |
Re: END THIS THREAD PLEASE | Cody Miller | 10/2/09 7:23 p.m. |
r-really? *NM* | Hawaiian Pig | 10/2/09 7:29 p.m. |
You are dumb *NM* | Eiii | 10/2/09 7:30 p.m. |
Oh crap now it just looks like I'm agreeing with h *NM* | Eiii | 10/2/09 7:34 p.m. |
with hp, captain handsome awesome. *NM* | Hawaiian Pig | 10/2/09 7:45 p.m. |
Re:Cody | Hedgemony | 10/2/09 7:57 p.m. |
Re:Cody | Cody Miller | 10/2/09 8:08 p.m. |
Re:Cody who? | Hedgemony | 10/2/09 8:51 p.m. |
Re:Cody who? | Hawaiian Pig | 10/2/09 9:08 p.m. |
Re:Cody who? | Hawaiian Pig | 10/2/09 9:13 p.m. |
Re:Cody | Hedgemony | 10/2/09 9:53 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | UNSC_Trooper | 10/2/09 1:12 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | Jillybean | 10/2/09 1:14 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | UNSC_Trooper | 10/2/09 1:27 p.m. |
lol equality for all | Jillybean | 10/2/09 1:51 p.m. |
Re: lol equality for all | UNSC_Trooper | 10/2/09 2:32 p.m. |
please | General Vagueness | 10/2/09 4:54 p.m. |
Re: please | Hawaiian Pig | 10/2/09 4:57 p.m. |
Re: lol equality for all | Hunt3r | 10/2/09 2:39 p.m. |
Re: lol equality for all | Cody Miller | 10/2/09 2:42 p.m. |
Re: lol equality for all | kanbo | 10/2/09 3:03 p.m. |
Re: lol equality for all | Jillybean | 10/2/09 6:22 p.m. |
Re: lol equality for all | DHalo | 10/2/09 6:39 p.m. |
Re: lol equality for all | Jillybean | 10/2/09 6:19 p.m. |
Re: lol equality for all | Photolysis | 10/2/09 3:16 p.m. |
For her next article... | Bones153 | 10/2/09 4:41 p.m. |
Re: For her next article... | Eiii | 10/2/09 5:41 p.m. |
That's sarcasm, right? *NM* *NM* | Bones153 | 10/2/09 5:45 p.m. |
I am totally guilty of this | Jillybean | 10/2/09 6:24 p.m. |
Re: I am totally guilty of this | Hawaiian Pig | 10/2/09 6:35 p.m. |
Re: I am totally guilty of this | Jillybean | 10/2/09 6:38 p.m. |
Re: I am totally guilty of this | Tex | 10/2/09 6:46 p.m. |
Stop helping me *NM* | Jillybean | 10/2/09 6:51 p.m. |
I wish I could quit you. | Tex | 10/2/09 6:56 p.m. |
Re: I wish I could quit you. | Jillybean | 10/2/09 7:08 p.m. |
Re: I am totally guilty of this | Cody Miller | 10/2/09 6:47 p.m. |
Re: I am totally guilty of this | Miguel Chavez | 10/3/09 12:42 a.m. |
Re: I am totally guilty of this | Cthulhu117 | 10/3/09 11:32 a.m. |
People think Dare was sexualized? LOL! | Dustbunny27 | 10/3/09 11:27 a.m. |
Re: People think Dare was sexualized? LOL! | Jillybean | 10/3/09 3:10 p.m. |
Re: People think Dare was sexualized? LOL! | Dustbunny27 | 10/3/09 3:37 p.m. |
Re: lol feminism | psychophan7 | 10/3/09 11:37 a.m. |
I have a hard time grasping this, personally *IMG* | Leviathan | 10/3/09 12:18 p.m. |
Serious Question for the ladies... or maybe men | Dustbunny27 | 10/3/09 2:23 p.m. |
Re: Serious Question for the ladies... or maybe me | Leviathan | 10/3/09 3:02 p.m. |
Okay, make a game for everyone then. | Dustbunny27 | 10/3/09 3:34 p.m. |
Re: Okay, make a game for everyone then. | Leviathan | 10/3/09 5:50 p.m. |
A couple that stand out for me | Jillybean | 10/3/09 3:16 p.m. |
Re: A couple that stand out for me | Cody Miller | 10/3/09 4:01 p.m. |
Re: A couple that stand out for me | Jillybean | 10/3/09 4:40 p.m. |
Re: Serious Question for the ladies... or maybe me | Document | 10/4/09 12:17 a.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |