glyphstrip FAQ button
Halo.bungie.org
glyphstrip
Frequently Asked Forum Questions
 Search the HBO News Archives

Any All Exact 
Search the Halo Updates DBs

Halo Halo2 
Search Older Posts on This Forum:
Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts


but....
Posted By: Magh Tuireadh <AStupidity@aol.com>Date: 1/22/00 11:49 a.m.

In Response To: Re: Unreliable... poor argument (Dan Rudolph)

> No. The cureent universe is moving faster than escape velocity.
> It will never begin to collapse. According to the second law of
> thermodynamics, previous incarnations that collapsed could not
> provide enough energy for this to happen.

But you dont know that the Second Law of Thermodynamcis would hold true in another universe. In a more random universe, where things dont follow set rules, it could have pulsed, expanding and contracting whenever it wanted to, and eventually closed accidentally. Anything could happen, ANYTHING.

Think about this, what about a universe where there was far more mass, but less energy. Such a universe would surely collapse, but then, when it reorganized itself, it converted some of the mass to energy, and now we have a universe that wont collapse. If you know about matter/anti-matter, this is familiar. 2 pockets of matter, one normal, one anti matter, collide, and energy is released in huge amounts....anyway, i digress....

.:Magh Tuireadh


Message Index




Replies:

No cyborgs in Halo...Xian 1/21/00 7:20 p.m.
     Re: No cyborgs in Halo...Myndreach 1/21/00 7:27 p.m.
           Almost... not quiteXian 1/21/00 7:34 p.m.
                 Re: Almost... not quiteDraeger 1/21/00 7:43 p.m.
                       Overthinking?Xian 1/21/00 7:54 p.m.
                             Re: Overthinking?Draeger 1/21/00 8:19 p.m.
                                   You're overthinking...Xian 1/21/00 9:21 p.m.
                                         Re: You're overthinking...Jägermeister 1/22/00 12:33 a.m.
                                               Unreliable... poor argumentXian 1/22/00 1:17 a.m.
                                                     Re: Unreliable... poor argumentMark Levin 1/22/00 3:11 a.m.
                                                           Re: Unreliable... poor argumentScorpio 1/22/00 9:27 a.m.
                                                                 Re: Unreliable... poor argumentRemix 1/22/00 1:02 p.m.
                                                                       Re: Unreliable... poor argumentDesio 1/22/00 3:04 p.m.
                                                                             It kind of boils down to THIS:Jägermeister 1/22/00 9:56 p.m.
                                                                                   Re: It kind of boils down to THIS:Desio 1/23/00 9:02 a.m.
                                                                                         Re: It kind of boils down to THIS:Jägermeister 1/23/00 4:19 p.m.
                                                                                               Re: It kind of boils down to THIS:Scorpio 1/23/00 4:47 p.m.
                                                                                                     Re: It kind of boils down to THIS:Mark Levin 1/23/00 6:16 p.m.
                                                           Look, a good rational response! ^_^Xian 1/22/00 11:39 a.m.
                                                                 I have been away to longDesio 1/22/00 12:02 p.m.
                                                     Re: Unreliable... poor argumenthakkikt 1/22/00 4:10 a.m.
                                                           Re: Unreliable... poor argumentDan Rudolph 1/22/00 8:35 a.m.
                                                                 but....Magh Tuireadh 1/22/00 11:49 a.m.
                                               Re: You're overthinking...Louis Wu 1/22/00 8:24 p.m.
                       Re: Almost... not quiteDan Rudolph 1/22/00 8:29 a.m.
                 Re: Almost... not quiteZeroRage 1/22/00 6:44 p.m.
                       Re: Almost... not quiteMage 1/22/00 6:48 p.m.
                             Re: Almost... not quiteZeroRage 1/23/00 8:24 p.m.
                                   Re: Almost... not quite8Delicious 1/24/00 11:15 a.m.
           Re: No cyborgs in Halo...Mark Levin 1/21/00 7:49 p.m.
                 The only one?Xian 1/21/00 7:59 p.m.
                       Re: That is confirmation I think....Draeger 1/21/00 8:21 p.m.
                       Re: The only one?Ben Schodek 1/21/00 11:22 p.m.
                             Odd jump in logic...Xian 1/21/00 11:38 p.m.
                             Re: The only one?Dan Rudolph 1/22/00 8:28 a.m.
                       Re: The only one?Louis Wu 1/22/00 8:16 p.m.
     omgScuttle 1/22/00 12:04 p.m.
           Re: omgMark Levin 1/22/00 1:10 p.m.



contact us

The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33.