Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Flood and evolution | |
Posted By: yakaman | Date: 2/8/12 1:03 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Flood and evolution (scarab) : Bungie says that the Flood starves without sentients. : But it also looks like it can grow in an environment without sentients. An
: So it can grow without us but somehow dies out. : I think this is because the environment strikes back. The Flood then either
: I don't know whether the environment is entirely FCS but has scattered into a
: I suspect the latter because, it seems, that in biology, no strategy wins
: Have you read any of the Pern books? : The thread is voracious and seems to conquer all. Yet, in the centuries
: I also wonder if the GMs act like shepherds. If they need sentients to
So Halo doesn't kill Flood - it kills their ability to evolve. Without Sentients, the Flood spores (FSCs) will be beaten by the environment (i.e. bacteria et al) and rendered a dead end. Brilliant strategy if your intended result is a galaxy wiped clean of higher life forms. It's almost like formatting a hard drive, but leaving BIOS intact. Best thread I've read in ages....
|
|
Replies: |
Flood and evolution | scarab | 2/7/12 8:47 p.m. |
Great post! | ZackDark | 2/7/12 9:01 p.m. |
Re: Great post! | scarab | 2/7/12 9:37 p.m. |
Re: Great post! | uberfoop | 2/7/12 10:24 p.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | kanbo | 2/7/12 9:35 p.m. |
Its independent of any fiction | scarab | 2/7/12 9:42 p.m. |
Re: Its independent of any fiction | kanbo | 2/7/12 10:50 p.m. |
No real spoilers | scarab | 2/8/12 1:34 a.m. |
Re: No real spoilers? eh... | General Vagueness | 2/9/12 11:42 a.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | Flynn J Taggart | 2/7/12 9:40 p.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | scarab | 2/7/12 9:59 p.m. |
Night guys | scarab | 2/7/12 10:00 p.m. |
Regarding Isolation | JDQuackers | 2/8/12 8:09 a.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/8/12 8:32 a.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | yakaman | 2/8/12 1:03 p.m. |
This thread is gold. *NM* | Postmortem | 2/8/12 9:09 a.m. |
Genetic space is not a constraint... | Arithmomaniac | 2/8/12 1:43 p.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | scarab | 2/10/12 2:21 a.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | JDQuackers | 2/10/12 7:13 a.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | scarab | 2/10/12 8:06 a.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | davidfuchs | 2/10/12 8:59 a.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | scarab | 2/10/12 10:10 a.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | General Vagueness | 2/10/12 10:10 p.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | Quirel | 2/11/12 2:58 a.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | General Vagueness | 2/11/12 11:02 a.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | Quirel | 2/11/12 12:35 p.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/11/12 12:38 p.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | General Vagueness | 2/11/12 1:07 p.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/11/12 1:55 p.m. |
Well... | ZackDark | 2/11/12 2:03 p.m. |
Re: Well... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/11/12 2:11 p.m. |
Re: Well... | ZackDark | 2/11/12 2:13 p.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | General Vagueness | 2/11/12 4:23 p.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/11/12 4:48 p.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | General Vagueness | 2/11/12 5:24 p.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/11/12 8:09 p.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | General Vagueness | 2/11/12 10:20 p.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/12/12 9:25 a.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | General Vagueness | 2/12/12 4:58 p.m. |
Re: Genetic space is not a constraint... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/12/12 5:19 p.m. |
If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | davidfuchs | 2/8/12 3:10 p.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/8/12 3:42 p.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | ZackDark | 2/8/12 4:36 p.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | Hoovaloov | 2/8/12 4:42 p.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | ZackDark | 2/8/12 4:57 p.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | davidfuchs | 2/8/12 5:23 p.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/8/12 6:07 p.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | Bry | 2/8/12 8:09 p.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/8/12 8:30 p.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | Bry | 2/8/12 10:03 p.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/9/12 5:38 a.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | Quirel | 2/8/12 10:46 p.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/9/12 5:41 a.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | davidfuchs | 2/9/12 8:00 a.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/9/12 8:02 a.m. |
Re: If there's no "cure" to the Flood... | Bry | 2/9/12 10:30 a.m. |
Well, crap. | Quirel | 2/9/12 10:37 a.m. |
Re: Well, crap. | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/9/12 11:46 a.m. |
Re: Well, crap. | Quirel | 2/9/12 5:06 p.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | General Vagueness | 2/9/12 11:37 a.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | scarab | 2/10/12 7:48 a.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | ZackDark | 2/10/12 5:04 p.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/10/12 5:19 p.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | ZackDark | 2/10/12 5:28 p.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/10/12 6:08 p.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | General Vagueness | 2/10/12 7:43 p.m. |
Re: Flood and evolution | General Vagueness | 2/10/12 10:25 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |