![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Re: Not campaign's fault.... | |
Posted By: Slimby | Date: 3/26/06 2:40 a.m. |
In Response To: Not campaign's fault.... (Max Power (aka- dewbe)) : If Halo 1 had online multiplayer, the single player campaign would have got
: If Halo 2 did NOT have online multiplayer, the single player campaign would
: To me, it's that simple. : ...and as Peptuck put nicely, online co-op with a game as complicated as Halo
Not true. I have no Xbox Live. I have no nerd friends, with exception to my girlfriend. I very rarely play multiplayer with any intent than to just relax with Karlia. And guess what campaign I play the most? Halo: Combat Evolved. Because it wasn't Halo: Multiplayer Evolved. It had an immersive campaign. I just can't help but think that Halo 2 was designed as a really good online shooter and the single player was slapped on as an afterthought. What's a better indication of longevity, 2003-present or 2004-2005? Assault on the Control Room, here I come. Slimby |
|
Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |