![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | |
Posted By: JonnyOThan | Date: 10/22/09 8:43 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: "Team Betrayals" (elessar787) : Just curious about the development, was that more of a design decision or : compensation for network latency? : You don't have to answer if you don't want to. I don't know for sure. I would guess design decision, since it's been there since Halo 1 and latency isn't really a factor on LAN. The compensation bit you might be thinking about is the fact that we use the outputs from the aim assist system to recreate a shot for networking. e.g. "I was aiming two feet to the right of my target's chest." Slightly more info on that here.
|
|
Replies: |
"Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | Gravemind | 10/21/09 6:17 p.m. |
Please!! | pete_the_duck | 10/21/09 6:22 p.m. |
Re: Please!! | chris101b | 10/21/09 6:28 p.m. |
Re: "Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | RyanTheHeretic | 10/21/09 6:27 p.m. |
Re: "Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | FyreWulff | 10/21/09 6:39 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Gravemind | 10/21/09 7:01 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | chris101b | 10/21/09 7:13 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Avateur | 10/21/09 7:27 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Hunt3r | 10/21/09 8:09 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | FyreWulff | 10/21/09 8:54 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | JonnyOThan | 10/22/09 4:06 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | elessar787 | 10/22/09 4:58 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | JonnyOThan | 10/22/09 8:43 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | elessar787 | 10/23/09 12:33 a.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Bernard Strauss | 10/21/09 10:40 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | scarab | 10/22/09 11:50 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Cody Miller | 10/22/09 5:02 p.m. |
Re: "Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | psychophan7 | 10/21/09 8:28 p.m. |
"Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | The BS Police | 10/21/09 10:42 p.m. |
Re: "Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | Captain Spark | 10/21/09 11:00 p.m. |
Personally, I'd like more sticky. | Jillybean | 10/22/09 8:31 a.m. |
Some weapons could do without... | Silent Knight | 10/22/09 1:01 a.m. |
+1 *NM* | Magni Harvald | 10/22/09 3:49 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |