![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | |
Posted By: Avateur <avateur@gmail.com> | Date: 10/21/09 7:27 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: "Team Betrayals" (Gravemind) : "Team Betrayals" isn't exactly a good example as it eliminates all : aim assistance, not just crosshair magnetism/sticky aim. Remember, there : are two forms of aim assist: sticky aim and "auto-aim/bullet : magnetism/whatever it's called," the latter which is the feature : where the game automatically adjusts bullet trajectories and is indicated : by a red crosshair. That form of aim assist I can deal with, and it's : fine at Halo 3 levels. It's the crosshair getting forced towards a target : that bothers me. I know how you feel, but it happens on such rare occasions that I don't feel it's that big of a deal. It only seems to pop up in heated circumstances where I may already be trying to take on two or three people by myself. But to be honest, it really comes in handy if I'm sniping, and removing it could really make that a lot more difficult (especially if we take lag into consideration). As a lag compensator, I love it! :P
|
|
Replies: |
"Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | Gravemind | 10/21/09 6:17 p.m. |
Please!! | pete_the_duck | 10/21/09 6:22 p.m. |
Re: Please!! | chris101b | 10/21/09 6:28 p.m. |
Re: "Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | RyanTheHeretic | 10/21/09 6:27 p.m. |
Re: "Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | FyreWulff | 10/21/09 6:39 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Gravemind | 10/21/09 7:01 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | chris101b | 10/21/09 7:13 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Avateur | 10/21/09 7:27 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Hunt3r | 10/21/09 8:09 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | FyreWulff | 10/21/09 8:54 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | JonnyOThan | 10/22/09 4:06 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | elessar787 | 10/22/09 4:58 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | JonnyOThan | 10/22/09 8:43 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | elessar787 | 10/23/09 12:33 a.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Bernard Strauss | 10/21/09 10:40 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | scarab | 10/22/09 11:50 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Cody Miller | 10/22/09 5:02 p.m. |
Re: "Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | psychophan7 | 10/21/09 8:28 p.m. |
"Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | The BS Police | 10/21/09 10:42 p.m. |
Re: "Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | Captain Spark | 10/21/09 11:00 p.m. |
Personally, I'd like more sticky. | Jillybean | 10/22/09 8:31 a.m. |
Some weapons could do without... | Silent Knight | 10/22/09 1:01 a.m. |
+1 *NM* | Magni Harvald | 10/22/09 3:49 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |