![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | |
Posted By: FyreWulff <mkidder@gmail.com> | Date: 10/21/09 8:54 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: "Team Betrayals" (Gravemind) : "Team Betrayals" isn't exactly a good example as it eliminates all : aim assistance, not just crosshair magnetism/sticky aim. Remember, there : are two forms of aim assist: sticky aim and "auto-aim/bullet : magnetism/whatever it's called," the latter which is the feature : where the game automatically adjusts bullet trajectories and is indicated : by a red crosshair. That form of aim assist I can deal with, and it's : fine at Halo 3 levels. It's the crosshair getting forced towards a target : that bothers me. What you're talking about doesn't exist. The only autoaiming is the reticule stickiness, bullets always fire in the same trajectory that you're facing. The red crosshair indicates that 1) you are in range and 2) reticule stickiness is in full force.
|
|
Replies: |
"Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | Gravemind | 10/21/09 6:17 p.m. |
Please!! | pete_the_duck | 10/21/09 6:22 p.m. |
Re: Please!! | chris101b | 10/21/09 6:28 p.m. |
Re: "Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | RyanTheHeretic | 10/21/09 6:27 p.m. |
Re: "Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | FyreWulff | 10/21/09 6:39 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Gravemind | 10/21/09 7:01 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | chris101b | 10/21/09 7:13 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Avateur | 10/21/09 7:27 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Hunt3r | 10/21/09 8:09 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | FyreWulff | 10/21/09 8:54 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | JonnyOThan | 10/22/09 4:06 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | elessar787 | 10/22/09 4:58 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | JonnyOThan | 10/22/09 8:43 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | elessar787 | 10/23/09 12:33 a.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Bernard Strauss | 10/21/09 10:40 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | scarab | 10/22/09 11:50 p.m. |
Re: "Team Betrayals" | Cody Miller | 10/22/09 5:02 p.m. |
Re: "Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | psychophan7 | 10/21/09 8:28 p.m. |
"Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | The BS Police | 10/21/09 10:42 p.m. |
Re: "Sticky aim" needs to be optional in Reach. | Captain Spark | 10/21/09 11:00 p.m. |
Personally, I'd like more sticky. | Jillybean | 10/22/09 8:31 a.m. |
Some weapons could do without... | Silent Knight | 10/22/09 1:01 a.m. |
+1 *NM* | Magni Harvald | 10/22/09 3:49 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |