Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: A final retort.
Posted By: Louis Wu <halo@bungie.org>	Date: 1/27/04 7:26 a.m.
In Response To: A final retort. (Nick) : Yea, I know you could care less, blah blah. I've seen more pointless threads : than this beat into the ground and nobody seemed to care *thinks about the : halo porn thread*. I guess all my posts are offending visitors on dial-up : or something. It has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH HOW LONG THE THREAD IS. It has to do with your attitude. And you've made it abundantly clear that you have absolutely zero awareness of how you're coming off. Not just to me (who stayed out of this thread until this morning - and I gotta tell you, I was pretty interested at the beginning), but to pretty much everyone who's commented. : But that's ok, I guess it's just another reason not to post here: try to make : your point and reply to those that reply to you, get yelled at and have : your thread locked. ::rolls eyes:: : I used to enjoy coming here and reading all the posts, : I really did, that is until posts with excessive crap started popping up : ("Halo 2 delayed again!?!?!" "halo porn" "I heard : Halo 1.5 is still coming out" "Halo 2 story leak!"). Hehe - please, let me know what forum you ARE frequenting that gives you the chance to talk about Halo and DOESN'T get threads like that. I'd love to go there. : You make a big deal out of my little thread that goes back and forth replying : to what people say in response to me. However, you don't bother to : moderate the threads filled with utter crap that have no foundation or : that have been excessively discussed before and beaten into the ground. A big deal? I wrote one post. 5 sentences. And that was after 56 posts, more than a third of which were yours, all pretty much covering exactly the same ground: "Wow, look! Here's a page that lists Halo 2 as using the Havok engine!" 'That's cool - but we don't know if they're actually doing it." "Yeah, but they could be!" "Or maybe they're not." "Or maybe they are!" and so on. I stayed out of it for almost 36 hours... but you finally found MY patience limit. I have an idea - if there are so many reasons for you not to post here... why not just not post here? Thanks.

Message Index

Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Nick	1/25/04 9:24 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	HaloNater	1/25/04 9:28 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Slimby	1/25/04 9:35 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	HaloNater	1/25/04 9:43 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Alexander Valient	1/26/04 9:32 a.m.
Havok 2 Physics Engine - Movies	Neurotic	1/25/04 9:38 p.m.
Re: Havok 2 Physics Engine - Movies	Mantis819	1/25/04 9:50 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Rip-Saw	1/25/04 10:22 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Nick	1/25/04 11:23 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Dark Bastion	1/25/04 10:27 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Nick	1/25/04 11:36 p.m.
Oh my.... thats cool.....	Mr.Mongoose	1/25/04 10:53 p.m.
Re: Oh my.... thats cool.....	Nick	1/25/04 11:46 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Dan Chosich	1/25/04 10:58 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Lt Devon	1/25/04 11:01 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Spartan_-X-	1/25/04 11:07 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Dylan	1/26/04 8:18 a.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Nick	1/26/04 12:20 a.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Count Zero	1/26/04 12:31 a.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Nick	1/26/04 12:56 a.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Walshicus	1/26/04 10:22 a.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Nick	1/26/04 3:01 p.m.
Not true.	Blitzkrieg	1/26/04 12:07 p.m.
Re: Not true.	Nick	1/26/04 3:05 p.m.
not to mention	oddworld18	1/26/04 3:18 p.m.
Re: not to mention	BOLL	1/26/04 3:26 p.m.
Nop, it uses Havok	Nick	1/26/04 4:11 p.m.
Re: Nop, it uses Havok	opie301	1/26/04 5:27 p.m.
Re: Nop, it uses Havok	Nick	1/26/04 5:37 p.m.
Re: Nop, it uses Havok	Aztec	1/26/04 6:33 p.m.
Re: Nop, it uses Havok	Nick	1/26/04 6:36 p.m.
Re: Nop, it uses Havok	KOPD	1/26/04 6:49 p.m.
Re: Nop, it uses Havok	Nick	1/26/04 7:30 p.m.
End of the Evaluation	opie301	1/26/04 6:37 p.m.
Well said. *NM*	XLNC	1/26/04 7:07 p.m.
Re: End of the Evaluation	Nick	1/26/04 7:24 p.m.
Re: End of the Evaluation	Aztec	1/26/04 7:41 p.m.
Bygones and such...	opie301	1/26/04 8:35 p.m.
Re: Bygones and such...	Nick	1/26/04 11:50 p.m.
Re: Bygones and such...	KOPD	1/26/04 11:58 p.m.
Re: Bygones and such...	Nick	1/27/04 12:14 a.m.
Kind of a jerk, aren't ya.	KOPD	1/27/04 12:18 a.m.
Re: Kind of a jerk, aren't ya.	Nick	1/27/04 12:35 a.m.
Re: Kind of a jerk, aren't ya.	Aztec	1/27/04 12:40 a.m.
Re: Kind of a jerk, aren't ya.	KOPD	1/27/04 12:44 a.m.
Re: Kind of a jerk, aren't ya.	Aztec	1/27/04 12:54 a.m.
Re: Kind of a jerk, aren't ya.	KOPD	1/27/04 12:55 a.m.
Re: Kind of a jerk, aren't ya.	Stefander	1/27/04 1:36 a.m.
Re: Bygones and such...	Aztec	1/27/04 12:02 a.m.
Re: End of the Evaluation	Count Zero	1/26/04 9:53 p.m.
Re: End of the Evaluation	Nick	1/26/04 10:23 p.m.
Re: End of the Evaluation	Wado SG	1/27/04 12:32 a.m.
Re: End of the Evaluation	Nick	1/27/04 1:12 a.m.
Re: End of the Evaluation	Count Zero	1/27/04 3:01 a.m.
Re: End of the Evaluation	Nick	1/27/04 4:02 a.m.
Enough.	Louis Wu	1/27/04 5:56 a.m.
A final retort.	Nick	1/27/04 7:02 a.m.
Re: A final retort.	Louis Wu	1/27/04 7:26 a.m.
This is exactly what I'm talking about.	Nick	1/27/04 1:51 p.m.
For the record...	KOPD	1/27/04 2:06 p.m.
Re: This is exactly what I'm talking about.	Count Zero	1/27/04 9:15 p.m.
Lies!	Lt Devon	1/26/04 7:12 p.m.
Re: Halo 2 Uses Havok 2 Physics Engine	Sledgefare	1/26/04 11:19 a.m.