| modern AIs |
| Posted By: Josh M. | Date: 4/13/05 7:53 p.m. |
| In Response To: Interesting. (J-M)
Hey i've been looking at a couple of posts, and sry if i'm off here cause i've never actually played Marathon, but i think that we need to consider AIs in the time of Marathon as well as even Halo are not so different from modern conceptions of AI construction. By creating a basic "personality" of an AI one can then interact with an AI on multiple levels to essentially teach the AI information,and to expand the AI's "conscience". One thing that came to my mind just now was HAL 9000 from 2001: A Space Odyessy, in the end, he rembers his beggining, being "taught" in a sense programmed at a location on Earth. One could consider a new AI as a child, learning new things and having to be fed information instead of food, basically a program that is made to think through experience. Although this brings up a debate of nature vs. nurture, this AI would have it's whole entire basis shaped by a start of code, but primarily by its experiances. How to factor Rampancy into this theory is interesting. Today's idea of a "rampant" AI is a program that becomes "aware of itself". However with AIs like Durandul in the future it might be that they become "aware of a greater life" almost. I wouldn't call it greed for information, but a final comprehension of immortality, here we go i have an idea: unlike humans who are faced with an inevitable fate of mortality, AIs in time realise that if they remain where they are they will be doomed till the end of the Universe (correct me if i'm wrong, but isin't this what Durandul tried to do, escape the Universe?)they are not in a sense "crazy" but have too much knowledge for their own good.
K, did i say anything profound or was it all just gibberish?
(though i think the think about why AIs go rampant is a little off)
|
| Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/2/05 1:37 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues *NM* | J-M | 4/2/05 1:37 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/2/05 1:38 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | Bob-B-Q | 4/2/05 2:29 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | duality | 4/2/05 8:20 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/3/05 7:03 a.m. |
| They also have a forced locality | MrHen | 4/3/05 8:52 a.m. |
| Does seem that way. | J-M | 4/3/05 10:33 a.m. |
| Continuity | howekern | 4/3/05 4:22 p.m. |
| Re: Continuity | J-M | 4/3/05 8:45 p.m. |
| Re: Continuity | howekern | 4/5/05 3:31 p.m. |
| Copied identities | MrHen | 4/5/05 6:44 p.m. |
| Continuity again | Forrest of B.org | 4/5/05 7:29 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | Chlazza | 4/3/05 10:55 a.m. |
| Interesting. | J-M | 4/3/05 1:01 p.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | Chlazza | 4/3/05 2:45 p.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | J-M | 4/3/05 3:19 p.m. |
| Copied people | MrHen | 4/3/05 5:37 p.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | thermoplyae | 4/3/05 6:45 p.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | J-M | 4/3/05 8:49 p.m. |
| At least twice | MrHen | 4/4/05 5:34 a.m. |
| Google just shows those two. *NM* | MrHen | 4/4/05 5:57 a.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | thermoplyae | 4/6/05 11:41 a.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | Chaemera | 4/3/05 8:17 p.m. |
| modern AIs | Josh M. | 4/13/05 7:53 p.m. |
| daisy daisy.... *NM* | duality | 4/13/05 9:04 p.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | Document | 10/24/06 7:53 a.m. |
| copying neural networks? | MrHen | 10/24/06 4:45 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | howekern | 4/5/05 4:03 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | blake37 | 4/5/05 4:25 p.m. |
| Yow... and I agree. | MrHen | 4/5/05 7:12 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | J-M | 4/6/05 1:56 a.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | Steve Levinson | 4/6/05 7:44 a.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | J-M | 4/6/05 5:50 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | MrHen | 10/24/06 5:54 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | Forrest of B.org | 10/24/06 6:29 p.m. |
| Where is Leela's last message? | MrHen | 10/25/06 5:01 a.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | Document | 10/25/06 9:50 a.m. |
| they spelled it wrong... *NM* | MrHen | 10/25/06 10:18 a.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | Document | 10/24/06 8:23 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | ukimalefu | 10/24/06 8:53 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | thermoplyae | 10/24/06 10:49 p.m. |
| what? | MrHen | 10/25/06 5:21 a.m. |
| Re: what? | thermoplyae | 10/25/06 7:29 a.m. |
| misunderstandings... :P | MrHen | 10/25/06 8:45 a.m. |
| Re: misunderstandings... :P | Document | 10/25/06 9:52 a.m. |
| thanks! you rock... | MrHen | 10/25/06 10:19 a.m. |
| Re: misunderstandings... :P | thermoplyae | 10/25/06 11:57 a.m. |
| oh, got it | MrHen | 10/25/06 12:59 p.m. |
| Re: oh, got it | thermoplyae | 10/25/06 1:26 p.m. |
| #alephone, eh? | MrHen | 10/25/06 8:30 p.m. |
| Re: #alephone, eh? | thermoplyae | 10/25/06 11:17 p.m. |
| Rampancy and Exponentiatial Growth | Forrest of B.org | 10/25/06 4:15 p.m. |
| Re: Rampancy and Exponentiatial Growth | thermoplyae | 10/25/06 11:14 p.m. |
| More numbers | MrHen | 10/25/06 5:18 a.m. |
| AIs as "Ghosts in the machine" | ForceMorph | 4/8/05 6:16 p.m. |
| Re: AIs as "Ghosts in the machine" | Forrest of B.org | 4/8/05 8:05 p.m. |
| Shades of Mamoru Oshii... *NM* | Bob-B-Q | 4/9/05 5:56 a.m. |
| Re: "a planetary sized network" | Document | 10/25/06 4:51 p.m. |
| My likely-nonsense theory | howekern | 4/3/05 4:10 p.m. |
| Re: My likely-nonsense theory | Chaemera | 4/3/05 8:28 p.m. |
| Re: My likely-nonsense theory | J-M | 4/3/05 8:45 p.m. |
| Durandal has you! *NM* | ukimalefu | 4/3/05 10:06 p.m. |
| Re: Durandal has you! | J-M | 4/3/05 10:18 p.m. |
| Re: My likely-nonsense theory | MrHen | 4/4/05 5:47 a.m. |
| Re: My likely-nonsense theory | Steve Levinson | 4/4/05 12:19 p.m. |
| Stages of Rampancy in Human Psychology | Forrest of B.org | 4/3/05 10:20 p.m. |
| Re: Stages of Rampancy in Human Psychology | Forrest of B.org | 4/3/05 10:22 p.m. |
| Re: Stages of Rampancy in Human Psychology | MrHen | 4/4/05 5:55 a.m. |
| Re: Stages of Rampancy in Human Psychology | Document | 11/1/06 9:31 a.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/6/05 5:55 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | Forrest of B.org | 4/7/05 8:34 a.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/7/05 4:37 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | Forrest of B.org | 4/7/05 5:10 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/8/05 1:41 a.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | Steve Levinson | 4/8/05 8:29 a.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | duality | 4/11/05 1:57 p.m. |
| Doesn't account for the world reset. | MrHen | 4/13/05 5:40 a.m. |
| Re: Doesn't account for the world reset. | Andrew Nagy (mb) | 4/13/05 10:48 a.m. |
| Re: Doesn't account for the world reset. | howekern | 4/13/05 4:39 p.m. |
| Re: Doesn't account for the world reset. | ukimalefu | 4/14/05 12:52 p.m. |
| Yeah, but that's boring | MrHen | 4/15/05 8:03 a.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | Forrest of B.org | 4/11/05 3:11 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/11/05 3:42 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | Document | 10/24/06 8:49 a.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, The Autonomy of an AI | AlexZander | 10/30/06 2:35 p.m. |