 | Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues |
| Posted By: duality | Date: 4/2/05 8:20 p.m. |
| In Response To: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues (J-M)
: 10)S'pht can interface with an AI directly, apparently independant of
: whatever basic technology the AI resides on.
: 11)They interface at a fundamental (code\mechanics level) rather than a
: linguistic one.
: 12) That makes no sense. Period.
Could be through an infrared/radio port for remote control. Or even more disturbing, the S'pht could be especially designed to interface with human computers.
: Finally, and most importantly, other than the AIs there are no wholly
: inorganic sentients. Just fleshbags and cyborgs.
Well what else would you call an inorganic (meaning _A_rtificial, or else mineral but that seems almost silly) sentient (in other words, _I_ntelligence)?
: We know that computers are _no longer binary_ which doesn't leave
: a whole lot of options. There's no real reason to switch to something
: other than binary as long as you're doing digital calculations. Adding
: additional states doesn't add any dimensionality to their logic structure.
: Why? Because two binary on off switches can be used to render anything
: that one trinary could. It means that computers use a fundamentally
: different paradigm, one that allows ranged statements. Trinary switches
: don't give you those any better than binaries do, you need something else
: entirely. I'll leave the evidence in your hands, as I don't feel like I
: know enough to draw any real conclusions.
Could add compactness or compression to an extremely vast system, especially one that's closed for 300+ years where every gram counts.
Yeah, I might not know what I'm talking about, but at least I tried :)
-Duality
|
| Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/2/05 1:37 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues *NM* | J-M | 4/2/05 1:37 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/2/05 1:38 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | Bob-B-Q | 4/2/05 2:29 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | duality | 4/2/05 8:20 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/3/05 7:03 a.m. |
| They also have a forced locality | MrHen | 4/3/05 8:52 a.m. |
| Does seem that way. | J-M | 4/3/05 10:33 a.m. |
| Continuity | howekern | 4/3/05 4:22 p.m. |
| Re: Continuity | J-M | 4/3/05 8:45 p.m. |
| Re: Continuity | howekern | 4/5/05 3:31 p.m. |
| Copied identities | MrHen | 4/5/05 6:44 p.m. |
| Continuity again | Forrest of B.org | 4/5/05 7:29 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | Chlazza | 4/3/05 10:55 a.m. |
| Interesting. | J-M | 4/3/05 1:01 p.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | Chlazza | 4/3/05 2:45 p.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | J-M | 4/3/05 3:19 p.m. |
| Copied people | MrHen | 4/3/05 5:37 p.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | thermoplyae | 4/3/05 6:45 p.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | J-M | 4/3/05 8:49 p.m. |
| At least twice | MrHen | 4/4/05 5:34 a.m. |
| Google just shows those two. *NM* | MrHen | 4/4/05 5:57 a.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | thermoplyae | 4/6/05 11:41 a.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | Chaemera | 4/3/05 8:17 p.m. |
| modern AIs | Josh M. | 4/13/05 7:53 p.m. |
| daisy daisy.... *NM* | duality | 4/13/05 9:04 p.m. |
| Re: Interesting. | Document | 10/24/06 7:53 a.m. |
| copying neural networks? | MrHen | 10/24/06 4:45 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | howekern | 4/5/05 4:03 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | blake37 | 4/5/05 4:25 p.m. |
| Yow... and I agree. | MrHen | 4/5/05 7:12 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | J-M | 4/6/05 1:56 a.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | Steve Levinson | 4/6/05 7:44 a.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | J-M | 4/6/05 5:50 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | MrHen | 10/24/06 5:54 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | Forrest of B.org | 10/24/06 6:29 p.m. |
| Where is Leela's last message? | MrHen | 10/25/06 5:01 a.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | Document | 10/25/06 9:50 a.m. |
| they spelled it wrong... *NM* | MrHen | 10/25/06 10:18 a.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | Document | 10/24/06 8:23 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | ukimalefu | 10/24/06 8:53 p.m. |
| Re: They also have a forced locality | thermoplyae | 10/24/06 10:49 p.m. |
| what? | MrHen | 10/25/06 5:21 a.m. |
| Re: what? | thermoplyae | 10/25/06 7:29 a.m. |
| misunderstandings... :P | MrHen | 10/25/06 8:45 a.m. |
| Re: misunderstandings... :P | Document | 10/25/06 9:52 a.m. |
| thanks! you rock... | MrHen | 10/25/06 10:19 a.m. |
| Re: misunderstandings... :P | thermoplyae | 10/25/06 11:57 a.m. |
| oh, got it | MrHen | 10/25/06 12:59 p.m. |
| Re: oh, got it | thermoplyae | 10/25/06 1:26 p.m. |
| #alephone, eh? | MrHen | 10/25/06 8:30 p.m. |
| Re: #alephone, eh? | thermoplyae | 10/25/06 11:17 p.m. |
| Rampancy and Exponentiatial Growth | Forrest of B.org | 10/25/06 4:15 p.m. |
| Re: Rampancy and Exponentiatial Growth | thermoplyae | 10/25/06 11:14 p.m. |
| More numbers | MrHen | 10/25/06 5:18 a.m. |
| AIs as "Ghosts in the machine" | ForceMorph | 4/8/05 6:16 p.m. |
| Re: AIs as "Ghosts in the machine" | Forrest of B.org | 4/8/05 8:05 p.m. |
| Shades of Mamoru Oshii... *NM* | Bob-B-Q | 4/9/05 5:56 a.m. |
| Re: "a planetary sized network" | Document | 10/25/06 4:51 p.m. |
| My likely-nonsense theory | howekern | 4/3/05 4:10 p.m. |
| Re: My likely-nonsense theory | Chaemera | 4/3/05 8:28 p.m. |
| Re: My likely-nonsense theory | J-M | 4/3/05 8:45 p.m. |
| Durandal has you! *NM* | ukimalefu | 4/3/05 10:06 p.m. |
| Re: Durandal has you! | J-M | 4/3/05 10:18 p.m. |
| Re: My likely-nonsense theory | MrHen | 4/4/05 5:47 a.m. |
| Re: My likely-nonsense theory | Steve Levinson | 4/4/05 12:19 p.m. |
| Stages of Rampancy in Human Psychology | Forrest of B.org | 4/3/05 10:20 p.m. |
| Re: Stages of Rampancy in Human Psychology | Forrest of B.org | 4/3/05 10:22 p.m. |
| Re: Stages of Rampancy in Human Psychology | MrHen | 4/4/05 5:55 a.m. |
| Re: Stages of Rampancy in Human Psychology | Document | 11/1/06 9:31 a.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/6/05 5:55 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | Forrest of B.org | 4/7/05 8:34 a.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/7/05 4:37 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | Forrest of B.org | 4/7/05 5:10 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/8/05 1:41 a.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | Steve Levinson | 4/8/05 8:29 a.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | duality | 4/11/05 1:57 p.m. |
| Doesn't account for the world reset. | MrHen | 4/13/05 5:40 a.m. |
| Re: Doesn't account for the world reset. | Andrew Nagy (mb) | 4/13/05 10:48 a.m. |
| Re: Doesn't account for the world reset. | howekern | 4/13/05 4:39 p.m. |
| Re: Doesn't account for the world reset. | ukimalefu | 4/14/05 12:52 p.m. |
| Yeah, but that's boring | MrHen | 4/15/05 8:03 a.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | Forrest of B.org | 4/11/05 3:11 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | J-M | 4/11/05 3:42 p.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, AIs, and fundamental issues | Document | 10/24/06 8:49 a.m. |
| Re: Cybertonics, The Autonomy of an AI | AlexZander | 10/30/06 2:35 p.m. |
