Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: For Barkbat and Shiska...
Posted By: PanZer <panzerschreck15@netscape.net>	Date: 2/2/03 6:26 p.m.
In Response To: For Barkbat and Shiska... (Killercow) A theory is not a theory without some form of proof or justification. You go on about all these different things, and you have no ability to prove any of them. It's all guessing. You claim the Flood doesn't infect Jackals and Grunts, and therefore couldn't have been created by the Forerunner. In that simple sentence, there's already gobs of assumptions made for which you can not back up any of them. 1)We don't know that the Forerunner created anyone 2)If they did create some species, how can you prove which ones were? 3)You cannot prove that Flood does not infect Grunts and Jackals. This is all assuming they don't. 4) You may it sound like the Flood was created almost like an intelligence gatherer. We don't have the foggiest idea where the Flood came from or why they are in existence. Here is a valid case: Elites have some sort of relation to the Halos, whether it be an ancient relation or much more recent. My justification? The same symbols that are found on the Elites can be found on various walls in 343 GS. Now, my question is: What version of the game are you running in which guilty spark has provided you with such an insight into the purpose of the Forerunner? In short, feel free to make theories, but that's just what it is, a theory. There are holes, whether you like it or not. Proof for a theory cannot be given by creating more assumptions and piling them on top of each other. Assumption A may be true because Fact A is given in the game. However, Assumption A cannot be true if Assumptions B + C are true. It's like piling up a bunch of lies, trying to make a truth.

Message Index

How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Killercow	1/30/03 9:36 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Millie	1/30/03 9:46 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Killercow	1/30/03 9:50 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Wilshire	1/30/03 10:01 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Mutti	1/30/03 10:04 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Wilshire	1/30/03 9:49 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	NJ_HitMan	1/30/03 9:51 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Mutti	1/30/03 9:55 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Killercow	1/30/03 9:56 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Miguel Chavez	1/30/03 10:08 p.m.
Maybe, but I say ITS A BIG MICROWAVE OVEN	Halosniper462	1/30/03 10:16 p.m.
Re: Maybe, but I say ITS A BIG MICROWAVE OVEN	Halosniper462	1/30/03 10:29 p.m.
Re: Maybe, but I say ITS A BIG Gamma-ray OVEN	Wado SG	1/31/03 12:14 a.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Major Tom	1/30/03 10:29 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Killercow	1/31/03 3:30 p.m.
I think you may be thinking too literally	PanZer	1/30/03 11:36 p.m.
Re: I think you may be thinking too literally	Louis Wu	1/31/03 8:13 a.m.
Re: I think you may be thinking too literally	Killercow	1/31/03 3:33 p.m.
Also, forgot this.	PanZer	1/30/03 11:47 p.m.
Re: Also, forgot this.	Killercow	1/31/03 3:42 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	mnemesis	1/31/03 1:39 a.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Louis Wu	1/31/03 8:11 a.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Warbow	1/31/03 8:19 a.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Louis Wu	1/31/03 8:37 a.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Warbow	1/31/03 8:39 a.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	CYBRFRK	1/31/03 8:52 a.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Louis Wu	1/31/03 9:26 a.m.
oh good god... *NM*	oddworld18	1/31/03 10:27 a.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	mnemesis	1/31/03 12:35 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Louis Wu	1/31/03 12:45 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	mnemesis	1/31/03 1:23 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Red Loser	1/31/03 1:45 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Wado SG	1/31/03 11:11 a.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Killercow	1/31/03 3:47 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Orome	1/31/03 11:16 a.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Killercow	1/31/03 3:49 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	CD579	2/2/03 4:12 a.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	silvos	2/2/03 1:53 p.m.
For Barkbat and Shiska...	Killercow	2/2/03 6:13 p.m.
Re: For Barkbat and Shiska...	PanZer	2/2/03 6:26 p.m.
Re: For Barkbat and Shiska...	Killercow	2/2/03 9:08 p.m.
For Tim Jones	Killercow	2/2/03 9:10 p.m.
Re: For Tim Jones	Tim Jones	2/10/03 8:43 a.m.
Re: For Tim Jones	Killercow	2/10/03 9:48 a.m.
For Killercow -- Kinda long	opie301	2/2/03 11:05 p.m.
Re: For Killercow -- Kinda long	Killercow	2/3/03 9:29 p.m.
Re: For Killercow -- Kinda long	PanZer	2/4/03 12:15 a.m.
Re: For Killercow -- Kinda long	Killercow	2/8/03 10:17 p.m.
Re: How Halo Works!!!!! (im really onto something)	Petrarch	2/7/03 6:10 p.m.