Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Halo 1 images are disingenuous | |
| Posted By: ArteenEsben | Date: 5/17/10 1:54 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Halo 1 images are disingenuous (Leisandir) : You're missing the fact that, regardless of pulsing or full-auto, there's : still spread. Depending on how you fire, it can be made more or less : apparent, but it's still there, and it's there for almost every weapon, in : all four games. Reach's system isn't new, just more obvious. The point is that the system in the previous games is fundamentally different from Reach. Spread and bloom aren't the same. In the previous games, you can pulse weapons at their maximum rate-of-fire without the spread increasing after each shot. In Reach, weapons get increasingly inaccurate if you fire them at the maximum rate. For example, each bullet in the BR has different spread, but that spread is not affected by how fast you fire the gun. | |
|
| Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |