Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Yes, it is. | |
Posted By: Narcogen <narcogen@rampancy.net> | Date: 10/15/08 12:06 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: Yes, it is. (Louis Wu) : I think you're missing the fact that two separate Bungie employees, at two : separate times, said two distinctly different things about that particular : bit of Halo lore. : The interview you're referring to was posted in October, 2004. Frankie's
: I'm not sure there's a consensus amongst Halo's writers about whether or not
I'm sorry, I'll taken Staten's word over Frankie's on the Halo story any day of the week. Meaning no respect to Frankie, he came on after Halo 1 and left for MS to follow the Halo IP, whereas Staten is a Bungie guy through and through and was there since before Halo started. That Frankie contradicted him two years later and that Staten backpedaled ever so slightly after that isn't particularly significant to me. It cut and dried unless you have already made up your mind that for some reason you want ILB to be considered canon unless there is evidence to the contrary. I think canon should be more conservative than that. Things should not be considered canon unless there is evidence that it is. Primary sources (the games) are obviously canon. Secondary materials produced directly by Bungie are canon (Staten's novel). Secondary materials produced with Bungie's direct involvement and approval are canon unless they contradict primary materials (the authorized novels). ILB was made by a third party not as a standalone product but as promotional materials, from source given to the authors by Bungie but without further direct involvement and/or supervision from Bungie. The ILB story does not rise to the same level of quality as the rest of the Haloverse. It was created primarily to advertise, was created primarily outside of Bungie, adds elements that are not followed up within primary sources and are not necessary for comprehending the primary plot arcs.
|
|
Replies: |
H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Bryan Ojeda | 10/12/08 12:16 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Vincent | 10/12/08 12:24 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Dave Bergland | 10/12/08 12:26 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | XMixMasterX | 10/12/08 12:43 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Bryan Ojeda | 10/12/08 12:47 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | The More Deluded | 10/12/08 12:55 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Bry | 10/12/08 1:19 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Zerowind117 | 10/12/08 10:33 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | elpolloguapo | 10/12/08 7:23 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | 343winks. | 10/12/08 12:54 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | The More Deluded | 10/12/08 12:57 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Bryan Ojeda | 10/12/08 12:58 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | XMixMasterX | 10/12/08 1:00 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | free | 10/12/08 1:08 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | 343winks. | 10/12/08 1:34 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | The More Deluded | 10/12/08 2:27 p.m. |
erm.. ie differences in accuracy, damage etc. *NM* | The More Deluded | 10/12/08 2:27 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Rosco-128 | 10/12/08 3:49 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Bryan Ojeda | 10/12/08 6:10 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Cthulhu117 | 10/12/08 6:12 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | 343winks. | 10/13/08 4:10 a.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | vlad3163 | 10/13/08 4:59 a.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | 343winks. | 10/13/08 5:35 a.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Cthulhu117 | 10/13/08 6:22 a.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Rosco-128 | 10/13/08 6:29 a.m. |
It's not. *NM* | UNSC_Trooper | 10/13/08 10:33 a.m. |
Yes, it is. | Cthulhu117 | 10/13/08 2:18 p.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | UNSC_Trooper | 10/14/08 8:18 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | My7hos | 10/14/08 8:37 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | UNSC_Trooper | 10/14/08 8:45 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Louis Wu | 10/14/08 8:47 a.m. |
My take. | My7hos | 10/14/08 9:06 a.m. |
Re: My take. | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 10/14/08 9:31 a.m. |
Re: My take. | My7hos | 10/14/08 1:49 p.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | UNSC_Trooper | 10/14/08 9:09 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Louis Wu | 10/14/08 9:47 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | UNSC_Trooper | 10/14/08 10:26 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Louis Wu | 10/14/08 11:08 a.m. |
You know if I was a Bungie employee... | Leviathan | 10/14/08 6:17 p.m. |
Re: You know if I was a Bungie employee... | Bryan Ojeda | 10/14/08 9:59 p.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Narcogen | 10/15/08 12:15 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Narcogen | 10/15/08 12:06 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | free | 10/15/08 1:30 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Narcogen | 10/15/08 4:20 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Bry | 10/15/08 3:55 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Narcogen | 10/15/08 4:25 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Bry | 10/15/08 5:04 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Narcogen | 10/15/08 7:09 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Bry | 10/15/08 10:50 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | My7hos | 10/15/08 11:00 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Narcogen | 10/16/08 2:53 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Bry | 10/16/08 3:54 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Sep7imus [subnova] | 10/15/08 6:35 p.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Narcogen | 10/16/08 3:18 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Sep7imus [subnova] | 10/16/08 6:33 a.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | free | 10/16/08 3:55 p.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | Bry | 10/16/08 5:07 p.m. |
Re: Yes, it is. | free | 10/16/08 6:12 p.m. |
I wish I could quit you | Jillybean | 10/15/08 7:43 a.m. |
Re: I wish I could quit you | Narcogen | 10/15/08 10:08 a.m. |
Re: I wish I could quit you | My7hos | 10/15/08 10:52 a.m. |
Leave the Cortana Letters out of this. | Louis Wu | 10/15/08 11:12 a.m. |
You missed my meaning... | My7hos | 10/15/08 11:17 a.m. |
Sgt Johnson | Miguel Chavez | 10/15/08 12:36 p.m. |
Re: Sgt Johnson | Sep7imus [subnova] | 10/15/08 3:40 p.m. |
ditto *NM* | Jillybean | 10/15/08 6:07 p.m. |
Re: Sgt Johnson | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 10/15/08 6:02 p.m. |
Re: Sgt Johnson | Bry | 10/16/08 2:36 a.m. |
Re: Sgt Johnson | Narcogen | 10/16/08 3:30 a.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | UNSC_Trooper | 10/13/08 10:38 a.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Vincent | 10/13/08 12:07 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Rosco-128 | 10/13/08 6:26 a.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | Devil Mingy | 10/13/08 6:28 a.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | vlad3163 | 10/13/08 8:32 p.m. |
Re: H3:R "Dual Wielding?" | elpolloguapo | 10/14/08 9:08 a.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |