Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Meh. Maybe. | |
Posted By: General Vagueness <General.Vagueness@gmail.com> | Date: 10/11/12 1:31 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Meh. Maybe. (uberfoop) : Well, I couldn't blame you for not wanting to deal with the first link; it's : the entire article, which is quite long. The second link specifically : points to my page about classic mode, and while I really should polish it : up a bit, it's as long as it is because there are that many problems. : If I can't get you to look at a detailed comparison, at least watch this. I never said they didn't mess up the fog. : I did not click your links, but that's because I'm completely familiar with
: And I would still stand by my point. A lot of people even consider button
and I would still stand against your point, the bug or bugs causing the button-combo-style behavior make the game broken to a certain degree, and any competent, self-respecting developer going over the game a second time would at least try hard to fix them : But there's no such thing as a "correct" or "exactly the
I wasn't referring to anything about that, I was responding to your comment about putting graphics on an old engine. : It's not like the campaign wound up particularly mechanically precise anyway.
I don't know most of what you're talking about. As for the video, in the first part, what makes you think that's a collision issue and they didn't just change how long it takes a fuel rod to automatically detonate, and I don't know what you're trying to illustrate in the second part. : *Yeah, not just the collision maps, but the collision system. For instance,
That could very well be a broader bug they fixed to keep things and/or players from getting stuck in objects or outside the map. If it was and they tried to fix it it didn't really work, but it's a plausible reason. Possibly even more plausible is that they added an invisible barrier or something that automatically teleports you so you wouldn't get out. : Again, my point is that focusing on the factors they focused on were possibly
I don't know why they did what they did and didn't do what they didn't do. Cost in time and money were probably really big factors. That said, what you find reasonable or even obvious, they might not, and don't think they'd just about-face on a repeated claim like that for another remake, or at least I kind of hope they wouldn't (because that would be another reason not to trust them). : It's in the text you quoted. Look up Halo Anniversary Postmortem. : You didn't notice any differences in the animated fog between two games that
I meant I didn't notice it not being there except in one case, although looking at the video above I might have noticed before that it wasn't on 343GS.
|
|
Replies: |
Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | Rice | 10/2/12 1:13 a.m. |
Re: Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | Quirel | 10/2/12 1:30 a.m. |
Re: Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | Ragashingo | 10/2/12 2:00 a.m. |
Re: Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | FyreWulff | 10/2/12 3:02 a.m. |
Re: Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | FyreWulff | 10/2/12 3:03 a.m. |
Re: Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | General Vagueness | 10/3/12 6:53 p.m. |
Meh. Maybe. | uberfoop | 10/2/12 3:24 a.m. |
Re: Meh. Maybe. | Rice | 10/2/12 4:00 a.m. |
Re: Meh. Maybe. | General Vagueness | 10/3/12 7:31 p.m. |
Re: Meh. Maybe. | uberfoop | 10/3/12 8:02 p.m. |
Re: Meh. Maybe. | General Vagueness | 10/5/12 12:09 a.m. |
Re: Meh. Maybe. | uberfoop | 10/5/12 3:01 a.m. |
Re: Meh. Maybe. | General Vagueness | 10/11/12 1:31 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | Archilen | 10/2/12 7:32 a.m. |
Re: Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | kapowaz | 10/2/12 7:49 a.m. |
Re: Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | Captain Spark | 10/2/12 11:50 a.m. |
I would like an H2A... | Nikko B201 | 10/2/12 5:19 p.m. |
Re: I would like an H2A... | General Vagueness | 10/3/12 9:09 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 10/2/12 6:44 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | Leviathan | 10/2/12 7:46 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 10/2/12 10:26 p.m. |
Re: Halo 2 : Anniversary by time of Halo 5? | dogcom | 10/5/12 10:26 a.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |