![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Re: Hitting 5000 - How will they hold you for Reac | |
Posted By: FyreWulff <mkidder@gmail.com> | Date: 12/29/09 3:05 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Hitting 5000 - How will they hold you for Reac (sharpsniper99) : That would just help the derankers! but that system would stop serial : quitting. : I wish I had the time to put as much thaught into my post as you did yours,
: I personally had a LOT of fun going for my 45 and then my 50 when i improved
: So ideally annother skill based system would be perfect for me for Reach, but
: But yeah Ranking should just be linked with asthetic changes, it shouldnt
: FyreWulff turtling at level 10 in snipers? That seems too low for the
Like I said, I could go for a 50. I was well on the way in SWAT. But getting hostbooted five games in a row, and dropping from a 39 to a 34 pretty much put me off playing ranked for a long time. I understand and know how the rank system works, and like it - it's just not worth the frustration from all the jerks in low-population playlists. The current state of the game is still leagues ahead of Halo 2 - playing anything outside of Team Training was futile due to rampant modding.
|
|
Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |