Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: All this said... | |
Posted By: Louis Wu <halo@bungie.org> | Date: 2/1/12 3:00 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: All this said... (Hoovaloov) : For those who get confused in MM, if you like the TU, then figure out what : playlists are TU and stick with those. If you don't like the TU, stick to : the other ones. This is a guaranteed way to never be confused again. :) Hrm. This seems like a pretty unsatisfying solution - you're suggesting that if I'm confused because of the mix, that I should limit myself tremendously. I should pick which of the three gametypes I like the best (never mind that I might like all three - just because someone gets confused about playstyles in the different lists, it doesn't mean that the REASON they're confused is because they dislike one or more of the styles), and then eat only from that table. If I decide Vanilla Reach is my favorite, I should simply give up on any 8v8 gametypes, or any types where precision weapons are dominant. I was a loud proponent for keeping vanilla reach in matchmaking, because I felt it was unreasonable for 343 to promise that it wasn't going away, and then let it go away - but after having played in the mixed lists for a while, I'd rather they settled on A style, and make all the lists that style - even if that style is not vanilla reach. That is - given the choice between slim pickings in a number of niches, or wide variety in a single niche, EVEN IF THAT NICHE WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN MY FIRST CHOICE, I'd vote for the latter. (Now.)
|
|
Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |