Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: Your analysis is grossly incomplete | |
Posted By: Hoovaloov | Date: 1/17/12 5:19 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Your analysis is grossly incomplete (uberfoop) : No, it's not. : [4,3,2;3,2,1] versus [2,3,4;3,2,1] : Q.E.D. I think I understand what you're showing, but in one set, you have compared each number and put them into a specific place to affect the results. Basically, you are introducing bias in one set, and no bias in another to prove your point. I simply sorted the data in ascending order. While this might introduce some bias, it is neutral and affects both sets equally. If this is still unacceptable, how would you suggest arranging the data to show the percentage of time a pacer will will against a spammer?
|
|
Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |