Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: Render test...for no good reason
Posted By: FrogBlast <metafire@aol.com>	Date: 11/12/02 12:35 a.m.
In Response To: Render test...for no good reason (Roger Wilco) : I'm bored so I thought I'd throw this up lest anyone think all I'm good for : is a bunch of inane off-topic posts. : I have been trying to put together a movie but it is slow going. With my : schedule I only get to put in a couple hours a week. Plus I won't have : much time to work on it through Thanksgiving. Anyway, it's nothing : spectacular, just a move test really...still needs much work. 320 x 280 QT : 4.7mb. I liked it! My IMHO (you are probably well aware of all of this) advice: 1) I think you need to improve the distant stars. Some of them look "smudged." Vector already mentioned the twinkling... but I can't tell if that was intentional or some sort of error with the rendering or compression. 2) The planet looks like it either needs an atmosphere, or some sort of "softer" interaction with that star's light. Maybe the glare from the star could overpower the planet a bit like the sun vs. trees in halo? :/ The ship looks great!!!!!! I want to see it in combat. :D : I had to bump up the gamma a bit for this...does anyone else feel Sorenson3 : comes out a bit on the dark side. yes >:/

Message Index

Render test...for no good reason	Roger Wilco	11/11/02 8:03 p.m.
Re: Render test...for no good reason	Louis Wu	11/11/02 8:11 p.m.
Re: Render test...for no good reason	Hipboyscott	11/11/02 8:12 p.m.
Re: Render test...for no good reason	Lion	11/11/02 8:33 p.m.
Re: Render test...for no good reason	Konrad9	11/11/02 9:33 p.m.
Re: Render test...for no good reason	vector40	11/11/02 11:28 p.m.
Re: Render test...for no good reason	Uriel	11/12/02 1:22 a.m.
Re: :)	•M	11/11/02 11:39 p.m.
Re: Render test...for no good reason	FrogBlast	11/12/02 12:35 a.m.
Re: Render test...for no good reason	Warbow	11/12/02 7:32 a.m.
twinkle twinkle	Roger Wilco	11/12/02 11:11 a.m.
Re: twinkle twinkle	ThetaDot	11/12/02 2:59 p.m.
Re: twinkle twinkle	Chris O	11/12/02 4:28 p.m.
Re: twinkle twinkle	Roger Wilco	11/12/02 7:25 p.m.
Random Insertion	SilV3RSix	11/12/02 9:18 p.m.
Re: twinkle twinkle	Roger Wilco	11/12/02 7:22 p.m.
Re: twinkle twinkle	ThetaDot	11/12/02 8:02 p.m.
Vespers should make short work of that. :) *nm*	Jonas	11/12/02 6:47 p.m.
Re: Vespers should make short work of that. :) *nm	Roger Wilco	11/12/02 7:53 p.m.
There is no Vesper. ::bends:: *NM*	vector40	11/13/02 12:57 a.m.
Re: Render test...for no good reason	Magimann	11/12/02 8:00 p.m.