Frequently Asked Forum Questions
Search the HBO News Archives Any All Exact		Search the Halo Updates DBs Halo Halo2		Bungie Webcam HBO XBL Gamertags *Ar's Simple HTML Guide Shishka's Guide for Newcomers The Lowdown on Download Accelerators Red Loser's Anti-Spamming Guide Egg FAQ | More Egg Stuff c0ld's Movie Starter Guide Shishka's HaloPC Pre-Release FAQ 3.1 AutoMagic 117 StripzMaker
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts

Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report
Posted By: Stephen L. (SoundEffect) <soundeffect@hotmail.com>	Date: 1/1/12 10:15 p.m.
In Response To: Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report (DEEP NNN) : Your point has a factual basis, or so I've been told. For Halo 2 and 3, : campaign was the biggest sales generator. Few people who hang around Halo : forums believe that though. They believe the sole sales generator for Halo : is multiplayer. : I was selling Living Dead short because I don't like the way it was done and : my imagination does not scream that gametype when I think of Halo. If the : infected were Flood character models, I may be more interested. For me, no : MM infection gametype was ever better than the custom games we used to : play in Halo 2. I still lean towards thinking customs is where it should : still be. : I am not convinced most people playing Living Dead do it because they like : it. I am of the opinion they dislike other MM gametypes more but like Halo : so much they'll settle for Living Dead. To me, it is devoid of any : commitment. Living Dead is the basic game of tag, that's all. No need for different character models. The point of the game is there's two teams like in any team slayer match but the teams change as the match plays on. If you're 'infected', you do the tagging trying to get more on your team. If you're not infected, you try to avoid getting tagged. I think it's more refreshing than team slayer where the teams are always the same.

My HBO Articles

Message Index

December 2011 REACH Population Report	DEEP NNN	1/1/12 9:23 a.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	davidfuchs	1/1/12 3:41 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	DEEP NNN	1/1/12 4:29 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	Stephen L. (SoundEffect)	1/1/12 5:14 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	DEEP NNN	1/1/12 7:04 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	General Vagueness	1/1/12 9:06 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	DEEP NNN	1/1/12 9:47 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	Hyokin	1/1/12 9:50 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	DEEP NNN	1/1/12 9:55 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	General Vagueness	1/1/12 10:23 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	DEEP NNN	1/2/12 6:28 a.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	General Vagueness	1/2/12 10:48 a.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	Stephen L. (SoundEffect)	1/1/12 10:15 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	Revenant1988	1/1/12 10:17 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	General Vagueness	1/1/12 10:30 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	Revenant1988	1/1/12 10:15 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	General Vagueness	1/1/12 10:43 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	Revenant1988	1/2/12 9:59 a.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	General Vagueness	1/2/12 11:16 a.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	DEEP NNN	1/2/12 6:24 a.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	RC Master	1/1/12 8:00 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	FyreWulff	1/1/12 9:09 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	Overdoziz	1/1/12 9:38 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	Hyokin	1/1/12 9:48 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	FyreWulff	1/1/12 9:58 p.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	Rt. Hon. Wolzee	1/2/12 8:47 a.m.
Re: December 2011 REACH Population Report	Hyokin	1/2/12 11:31 a.m.