![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| Re: How so? | |
| Posted By: Archilen | Date: 8/31/11 3:10 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: How so? (scarab) : The Reach Spartan designs are my favorite. : Mark VI has a slight case of man boobs and does have a diaper problem. I
I was never particularly a fan of the Mark VI either, even though it far surpasses the current H4 armor design. I always thought it looked more like a generic super soldier armor suit than the more unique, angular tank-like design from Halo 1. Nevertheless, it's become the most recognizable and iconic of all the armor designs and I would've preferred to see it in H4. : I think that the Reach designs fixed the nappy problem. OTOH I'm looking at
Sadly, the CEA design keeps the massive diaper. I'm still wondering why they didn't just go with the Reach armor with Mark V helmet and shoulders instead of doing another complete redesign. : I don't like the blended torso and arms of the new design. It looks like the
: And the chest plate doesn't look as good as the one on the Mark IVs in Reach.
Exactly. I think they should've stuck with the X-shaped chest design for the Mark VI from the start instead of the generic "man boobs" armor. : And the tummy stripes don't look as nice as the tummy details in the Reach
I still think the original Mark V is the best MJOLNIR yet, though the Reach version is a close second. Definitely agree on the silhouette.
| |
|
| Replies: |
| H:4 Armor from PAX Article, hints about abilities | Revenant1988 | 8/31/11 8:02 a.m. |
| Re: H:4 Armor from PAX Article, hints about abilit | Dubbl3.utoo | 8/31/11 8:19 a.m. |
| I can see it now. | ElzarTheBam | 8/31/11 8:24 a.m. |
| Jeez, that armour is urrrgly | mattroe | 8/31/11 9:01 a.m. |
| Wait | mattroe | 8/31/11 9:02 a.m. |
| It's an improvement | padraig08 | 8/31/11 9:19 a.m. |
| Re: It's an improvement | mattroe | 8/31/11 9:24 a.m. |
| Re: It's an improvement | Archilen | 8/31/11 9:34 a.m. |
| I would look at it like this | Revenant1988 | 8/31/11 9:39 a.m. |
| Glad they chose BlueRealm | Myyke | 8/31/11 10:06 a.m. |
| Re: Jeez, that armour is urrrgly | Archilen | 8/31/11 9:10 a.m. |
| Astro Nappy was fixed in Reach | scarab | 8/31/11 11:03 a.m. |
| You know what's got me laughing? | scarab | 8/31/11 11:15 a.m. |
| Re: Jeez, that armour is urrrgly | goCHIEFgo | 8/31/11 1:15 p.m. |
| Re: Jeez, that armour is urrrgly | Archilen | 8/31/11 2:33 p.m. |
| Re: Jeez, that armour is urrrgly | goCHIEFgo | 8/31/11 4:21 p.m. |
| How so? | serpx | 8/31/11 2:35 p.m. |
| Re: How so? | Archilen | 8/31/11 2:47 p.m. |
| Re: How so? | scarab | 8/31/11 3:07 p.m. |
| Re: How so? | scarab | 8/31/11 2:55 p.m. |
| Re: How so? | Archilen | 8/31/11 3:10 p.m. |
| Re: How so? | scarab | 8/31/11 3:40 p.m. |
| Re: How so? | Archilen | 9/1/11 2:42 a.m. |
| Re: H:4 Armor from PAX Article, hints about abilit | Archilen | 8/31/11 9:01 a.m. |
| no, just no | nomis78 | 8/31/11 9:19 a.m. |
| Re: H:4 Armor from PAX Article, hints about abilit | Mazz | 8/31/11 9:02 a.m. |
| I find your lack of codpiece disturbing | Myyke | 8/31/11 9:39 a.m. |
| That reminds me.... | bluerunner | 8/31/11 10:00 a.m. |
| From that angle... | BlueNinja | 8/31/11 6:36 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |