/-/S'pht-Translator-Active/-/ |
Re: The Nakh | ||
Posted By: thermoplyae | Date: 11/27/04 2:23 p.m. | |
In Response To: The Nakh (Andrew Nagy) : Did anyone ever figure out if there's a known nova or supernova that occurred
The sensical approach: The distance of the observable universe is (without any crazy Einsteinian quirks) is the distance light has had the time to travel from point A to point B. So, if we take the amount of time elasped between the current year and the year of the nova event, we will have the time window light has. Strangely enough, modern science has a pretty convenient unit for figuring out just how far that is: the light year. :) ∴ if we were to take the time of, say, 2811 AD (the beginning of M2, dunno where your particular timeline takes place), then 2811 - (-3189) = 2811 + 3189 = 6000 [woah...was that on purpose?] years. At this particular point in time, we can see at this very moment the events of 3189 B.C. from 6000 l.y. away. Better? |
|
Replies: |
The Nakh | Andrew Nagy | 11/24/04 10:11 p.m. | |
Re: The Nakh | Steve Levinson | 11/24/04 11:27 p.m. | |
Re: Tau Ceti G8 | •M | 11/24/04 11:53 p.m. | |
Re: The Nakh | Forrest of B.org | 11/25/04 12:51 a.m. | |
Re: The Nakh | Blayne | 11/25/04 3:19 p.m. | |
Re: The Nakh | Steve Levinson | 11/25/04 10:36 p.m. | |
Re: The Nakh | Forrest of B.org | 11/26/04 9:17 a.m. | |
Re: The Nakh | thermoplyae | 11/27/04 2:23 p.m. | |
Re: The Nakh | Forrest of B.org | 11/27/04 6:06 p.m. | |
Re: The Nakh | Andrew Nagy | 11/27/04 7:15 p.m. | |
Re: The Nakh | Forrest of B.org | 11/28/04 12:13 a.m. | |
Re: The Nakh | thermoplyae | 11/27/04 7:41 p.m. | |
Re: The Nakh | Forrest of B.org | 11/28/04 12:03 a.m. |
|
Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email maintainer@bungie.org Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12. |