Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | |
Posted By: BlueNinja <kennethdemuyt@msn.com> | Date: 9/26/10 5:30 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story (Riceatron) : Hurr durr porp a worpa dorp. : That is for you, sir. : This, when people aren't speaking English, everything seems to go fine. Maybe
: Definately. : >Find the marines
: "ENEMY BAD GUYS OVER THERE!"
: Reach failed to deliver in a lot of places when it came to dialogue : Jorge "Three, Zealot class. Armor configuration matched";
: Oh haha, Six thinks he's a people.
: OOOoooOooOOoooOOH. : [snip]
: Well, most of those quotes happened at the BEGINNING of FoR... So... All
: It just occured to me the players who don't care for Halo's story at all are
People who don't know or care about Halo's storyline probably won't even remember Cortana said that. A friend of mine who'd beaten the game thought Reach took place hundreds of years before Halo 1. The Cortana references, heck, even the remake of Halo's first cutscene at the end: they all went over his head, and he's played all the games. We, the ones who know enough to be able to debate about it, are in the minority. Of all the people who bought and played Reach, only a small fraction is even aware Bungie's new storyline clashes with how it was originally conceived Sure, you've got a point about games superceding the novels canon-wise, but Bungie had to approve the story of FoR when it came out all those years ago, as well. Sure, they made the universe, so they can bend canon if they need to. The thing is, why did they? I'm positive Reach could've had an as much engaging story without completely screwing up the timeline. They included Cortana and the Pillar of Autumn possibly out of fan service, but they could just as easily have come up with a story that didn't require the PoA to be in two places at once. I love Reach, and I love its story, but when viewed from a canon perspective they really dropped the ball. I agree with the OP about dialogue, to a certain extent. There's some great dialogue in Reach, which imo makes the rough spots stand out. Nothing's perfect, I guess. Apologies if my writing in this post seems a bit off, I typed this from my cell phone.
|
|
Replies: |
A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | General Battuta | 9/26/10 1:25 p.m. |
Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | General Battuta | 9/26/10 1:29 p.m. |
Fall of Reach Canon | Cody Miller | 9/26/10 1:45 p.m. |
Officially Licensed... | Riceatron | 9/26/10 1:53 p.m. |
Re: Officially Licensed... | Gordon Freeman | 9/26/10 2:16 p.m. |
Re: Officially Licensed... | General Battuta | 9/26/10 3:20 p.m. |
Re: Officially Licensed... | Tex | 9/26/10 3:25 p.m. |
Oh don't even. | Riceatron | 9/26/10 4:30 p.m. |
Re: Oh don't even. | DHalo | 9/26/10 4:46 p.m. |
;3 *NM* | Tex | 9/26/10 6:08 p.m. |
: | *NM* | Riceatron | 9/26/10 6:17 p.m. |
HBO: : | *NM* | SonofMacPhisto | 9/26/10 6:42 p.m. |
HBO: Riceatron is a faggot *NM* | Gordon Freeman | 9/26/10 8:13 p.m. |
Absolutely uncalled for *NM* | vlad3163 | 9/26/10 10:23 p.m. |
Agreed *NM* | Avateur | 9/26/10 11:07 p.m. |
Re: Absolutely uncalled for | Gordon Freeman | 9/26/10 11:13 p.m. |
Re: Absolutely uncalled for | vlad3163 | 9/26/10 11:26 p.m. |
Re: Absolutely uncalled for | Gordon Freeman | 9/26/10 11:31 p.m. |
Re: Absolutely uncalled for | vlad3163 | 9/26/10 11:42 p.m. |
Oh, you're one of those guys... | Jordan117 | 9/27/10 3:08 p.m. |
Dude, I love Louis CK. *NM* | Tex | 9/27/10 3:34 p.m. |
Re: Oh, you're one of those guys... | Spartan Jag | 9/27/10 4:36 p.m. |
Wait, what? | Jordan117 | 9/27/10 5:06 p.m. |
Re: Wait, what? | General Vagueness | 9/27/10 5:44 p.m. |
Re: Wait, what? | Spartan Jag | 9/27/10 11:20 p.m. |
Re: Wait, what? | gunluva | 9/27/10 11:29 p.m. |
Me neither. | Jordan117 | 9/28/10 2:23 a.m. |
And here I thot this thread was relevant to the OP *NM* | thebruce0 | 9/28/10 10:43 a.m. |
It's the Internet | Hawaiian Pig | 9/27/10 5:22 p.m. |
Re: Absolutely uncalled for | Avateur | 9/26/10 11:33 p.m. |
HBO: Absolutely uncalled for *NM* | reprobate | 9/27/10 1:35 a.m. |
This is what I wake up to? | Riceatron | 9/27/10 6:59 a.m. |
Re: This is what I wake up to? | Wayward Spleen™ | 9/27/10 2:13 p.m. |
Re: This is what I wake up to? | Crab | 9/30/10 10:55 a.m. |
HBO : Gordon Freeman is a dick. | Riceatron | 9/27/10 7:11 a.m. |
Re: HBO : Gordon Freeman is a dick. | RyanTheHeretic | 9/27/10 7:17 a.m. |
Re: HBO : Gordon Freeman is a dick. | Spartan Jag | 9/27/10 1:56 p.m. |
Re: HBO: Riceatron is a faggot | Frankie | 9/27/10 1:40 p.m. |
HBO: Makes Frankie ask "wtf"? *NM* | Wayward Spleen™ | 9/27/10 2:08 p.m. |
Re: HBO: Riceatron is a faggot | Quirel | 9/27/10 3:21 p.m. |
Re: Fall of Reach Canon | furiocity | 9/26/10 3:00 p.m. |
Re: Fall of Reach Canon | The BS Police | 9/26/10 3:04 p.m. |
Re: Fall of Reach Canon | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 9/26/10 3:12 p.m. |
Seriously, people! | General Battuta | 9/26/10 3:19 p.m. |
Upboated | kapowaz | 9/26/10 3:38 p.m. |
Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | Avateur | 9/26/10 3:38 p.m. |
Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | General Battuta | 9/26/10 3:59 p.m. |
Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | Hawaiian Pig | 9/26/10 4:37 p.m. |
Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | Riceatron | 9/26/10 4:49 p.m. |
Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | BlueNinja | 9/26/10 5:30 p.m. |
Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | Silent Knight | 9/26/10 6:45 p.m. |
Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | thebruce0 | 9/28/10 10:51 a.m. |
Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | General Vagueness | 9/27/10 12:28 a.m. |
Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | Kermit | 9/27/10 11:55 a.m. |
Re: A Tiered Critique of Reach's Story | Wayward Spleen™ | 9/27/10 12:54 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |