/-/S'pht-Translator-Active/-/ |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | ||
Posted By: Forrest of B.org | Date: 12/21/04 10:26 a.m. | |
In Response To: Re: Eternal Mk IV (Adam Ashwell) : Yes, that was in M2. I think it makes sense, too - the Lava F'lickta are
For that matter I was wondering the other day - why don't plasma bolts do 'flame' damage? Shouldn't getting hit with plasma burn up the target? Might be interesting to implement that in Eternal X. Would force you to use something other than Plasma weapons if you want to steal someone's weapon. I've been thinking of beefing up the Pfhorstaff and adding ammo to the Trooper Rifle anyway, so that might counterbalance such a change. But I think plasma weapons are supposed to do some sort of 'electrical' damage, as off as that seems by the name, since they 'short out' Pfhor machinery. Maybe I should rename them to "Fusion" weapons (which seems to be used synonymously in Marathon), and leave it at that. |
|
Replies: |
Eternal Mk IV | Andrew Nagy | 12/19/04 10:19 p.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | Andrew Nagy | 12/19/04 10:26 p.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | Adam Ashwell | 12/20/04 9:54 a.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | Forrest of B.org | 12/20/04 9:49 p.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | D-M.A. | 12/20/04 9:58 p.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | Adam Ashwell | 12/21/04 10:11 a.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | Andrew Nagy | 12/20/04 9:14 a.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | blake37 | 12/20/04 10:42 a.m. | |
not a double post *NM* | Andrew Nagy | 12/20/04 9:11 p.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | Forrest of B.org | 12/20/04 9:44 p.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | D-M.A. | 12/20/04 9:55 p.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | Adam Ashwell | 12/21/04 9:54 a.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | Forrest of B.org | 12/21/04 10:26 a.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | ukimalefu | 12/21/04 3:50 p.m. | |
Re: Eternal Mk IV | blake37 | 12/21/04 10:45 a.m. |
|
Problems? Suggestions? Comments? Email maintainer@bungie.org Marathon's Story Forum is maintained with WebBBS 5.12. |