Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Why didn't the Covenant just shoot the MAC's?? | |
| Posted By: 58 <gundamx@adelphia.net> | Date: 12/30/05 9:57 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: Why didn't the Covenant just shoot the MAC's?? (M6D) All of the stations at Earth are the same or greater power to that of the twenty at Reach. I say this because their size matches the description of the ones at Reach: The size of a UNSC Battle Cruiser. You must recall that the stations at Reach are technically Orbital MAC Stations, not "Super" MACs. Super MAC is a nickname. Any unmoving station armed with a MAC would have to have a "super", otherwise why not just stick engines on it? Someone answer me this: Would it be easier for the Covenant to take Earth when Earth is defended by three hundred "super" MACs and one or two hundred Frigates with about twenty Cruisers, or would it be easier with no orbital MACs, one or two hundred Frigates and Destroyers, and three hundred Cruisers? | |
|
| Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |