Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: In Amber Clad loadout discussion | |
| Posted By: oBlade. | Date: 3/28/05 10:24 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: In Amber Clad loadout discussion (sh33p) : the crewmen, another quarter to the crew living spaces, a quarter to
Note:
Is there any evidence a Halcyon has armories of Archer reloads? Looks to me like a.)the PoA simply couldn't reload from Reach while in slipspace b.) Archers are replenished elsewhere Bad pattern of logic...
Also, more advanced systems definately does NOT mean more space. Take a look at the engine room on The Maw (that's the reactor complex), and note how NOT BIG it is. Even though we don't know how much is buried in the walls, one could assume from that level that 4 fusion reactors don't take up too much space in 2552. And we KNOW it has 4 reactors... take a look at the PoA's main engines... note four gigantic bell nozzles. One last thing, you forgot a Ticonderoga is thinner and shorter than a Halcyon cruiser, not just shorter. | |
|
| Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |