Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
Re: No Bots | |
Posted By: Narcogen <narcogen@rampancy.net> | Date: 9/25/01 7:32 a.m. |
In Response To: Re: No Bots (*Ar-Isildur of *WP*) : Halo multiplayer isn't exactly as simple as Unreal Tournament multiplayer,
Except.. the AI already has to do this. Enemies have to use their vehicles, and the human troops supporting the player in the solo campaign need to, as well. A multiplayer bot basically needs to behave like a Covenant, but look like a marine, with adjustments made for the appropriate armament and vehicles, which I'd guess could be cut and pasted from the marine AI code. Yes it could be done, but Bungie is also hell-bent on making
: When you factor everything else that is in the game, multiplayer bots are too
I'd have to disagree. With no online play other than splitscreen or direct connections, the possibilities for multiplayer are greatly reduced. Given that they've spent a lot of time on multiplayer, including multiple modes, it seems unlikely that an intentional sacrifice was made to improve the single player experience at the expense of the multiplayer one. I suspect there is some other reason. --Narcogen |
|
Replies: |
Hey Matt, or Louis | cubanB | 9/23/01 8:02 p.m. |
Matt! | vector40 | 9/23/01 9:06 p.m. |
Re: Matt! | hob | 9/23/01 10:44 p.m. |
Re: Matt! | vector40 | 9/23/01 11:12 p.m. |
Re: Matt! | beef | 9/24/01 3:17 a.m. |
Re: Matt! | vector40 | 9/24/01 7:12 p.m. |
Re: Matt! | hob | 9/23/01 10:51 p.m. |
Re: Matt! | cubanB | 9/23/01 11:45 p.m. |
Re: Matt! | Skeletor | 9/24/01 12:57 a.m. |
Re: Matt! | Psyrixx | 9/24/01 2:09 a.m. |
Re: Matt! | vector40 | 9/24/01 7:13 p.m. |
Re: Matt! | Psyrixx | 9/24/01 7:29 p.m. |
Re: Matt! | Louis Wu | 9/24/01 7:39 p.m. |
Re: Matt! | vector40 | 9/24/01 10:37 p.m. |
Re: Matt! | SniperBob700 | 9/24/01 3:24 p.m. |
Re: Matt! | Speaker-To-Animals | 9/24/01 11:25 a.m. |
Re: Matt! | RAZORBACK | 9/24/01 1:35 p.m. |
Re: Hey Matt, or Louis | beef | 9/24/01 3:27 a.m. |
No Bots *NM* | Matt | 9/24/01 3:54 p.m. |
Re: No Bots | RAZORBACK | 9/24/01 4:04 p.m. |
You're kidding, right? | Fuolornis Fire Dragon | 9/24/01 4:19 p.m. |
I feel depressed | St. Killer | 9/24/01 4:25 p.m. |
Read my response to fire dragon. *NM* | *Ar-Isildur of *WP* | 9/24/01 6:11 p.m. |
Re: You're kidding, right? | *Ar-Isildur of *WP* | 9/24/01 6:10 p.m. |
When? | Pfhor | 9/24/01 6:13 p.m. |
Re: When? | *Ar-Isildur of *WP* | 9/24/01 6:21 p.m. |
Re: When? | Fuolornis Fire Dragon | 9/24/01 9:35 p.m. |
Re: When? | *Ar-Isildur of *WP* | 9/24/01 11:38 p.m. |
Re: You're kidding, right? | Dead Glory | 9/25/01 1:37 a.m. |
Re: You're kidding, right? | Fuolornis Fire Dragon | 9/25/01 4:20 p.m. |
a sad day indeed... | op_ivy | 9/24/01 7:14 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | vector40 | 9/24/01 7:17 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | op_ivy | 9/24/01 7:20 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | Psyrixx | 9/24/01 7:23 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | brendan | 9/24/01 8:07 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | *Ar-Isildur of *WP* | 9/24/01 8:30 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | Skeletor | 9/24/01 9:22 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | jamman | 9/24/01 9:57 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | =NAV=Shadow | 9/24/01 11:14 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | KilerCris | 9/25/01 1:48 a.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | Mr. Temper | 9/25/01 8:35 a.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | RAZORBACK | 9/25/01 9:40 a.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | -ctr- | 9/25/01 12:15 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | vector40 | 9/25/01 7:18 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | Dan Rudolph | 9/25/01 3:40 a.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | Narcogen | 9/25/01 7:06 a.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | Dan Rudolph | 9/25/01 12:25 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | Ferrex (Microserf) | 9/25/01 1:31 p.m. |
QED *NM* | vector40 | 9/25/01 7:23 p.m. |
Re: QED | Louis Wu | 9/25/01 7:30 p.m. |
Re: QED | vector40 | 9/25/01 7:41 p.m. |
Re: QED | Lophan | 9/26/01 8:06 a.m. |
Re: QED | Louis Wu | 9/26/01 10:06 a.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | KilerCris | 9/26/01 7:55 p.m. |
Re: a sad day indeed... | vector40 | 9/25/01 7:20 p.m. |
Uhhh.... there IS a single-player game, you know. *NM* | JCC | 9/25/01 11:39 a.m. |
Re: No Bots | Xmagic2002 | 9/24/01 11:19 p.m. |
Re: No Bots | *Ar-Isildur of *WP* | 9/24/01 11:30 p.m. |
Re: No Bots | Xmagic2002 | 9/24/01 11:40 p.m. |
Re: No Bots | *Ar-Isildur of *WP* | 9/24/01 11:50 p.m. |
Re: No Bots | Narcogen | 9/25/01 7:32 a.m. |
Re: No Bots | vector40 | 9/25/01 7:39 p.m. |
Cute. :) *NM* | Louis Wu | 9/25/01 8:08 p.m. |
Re: No Bots | vector40 | 9/25/01 7:24 p.m. |
Re: No Bots | Narcogen | 9/25/01 7:17 a.m. |
Good point. *NM* | *Ar-Isildur of *WP* | 9/25/01 8:49 a.m. |
Re: No Bots | snatcheroo | 9/26/01 4:03 a.m. |
Re: No Bots | Bob the Shoe | 9/25/01 12:43 a.m. |
Re: No Bots | *Ar-Isildur of *WP* | 9/25/01 1:22 a.m. |
Re: No Bots | Arch Angel | 9/25/01 7:39 a.m. |
No Bots? | DeAdLy_cOoKiE | 9/25/01 1:56 p.m. |
Remember me? | epollyon | 9/25/01 5:13 p.m. |
Why? | Matt | 9/25/01 5:55 p.m. |
Re: Why? | vector40 | 9/25/01 7:45 p.m. |
Single Player? | Narcogen | 9/25/01 11:46 p.m. |
Re: Single Player? | vector40 | 9/25/01 11:52 p.m. |
Re: Single Player? | {mAc}Dark_Eagle | 9/26/01 3:04 a.m. |
Re: Single Player? | Louis Wu | 9/26/01 10:08 a.m. |
But the design has changed! | Nitpicker | 9/26/01 7:47 p.m. |
Bots in PC version...? | Bluskale | 9/25/01 5:24 p.m. |
(don't bug, it's paraphrased) | vector40 | 9/25/01 7:43 p.m. |
Re: No Bots *NM* | krister | 9/25/01 7:53 p.m. |
This thread has grown much too large. >:( *NM* | *Ar-Isildur of *WP* | 9/26/01 1:32 p.m. |
Re: .......ok *NM* | RAZORBACK | 9/26/01 2:28 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |