In Response To: Re: New Halo Preview is awful (Gorehead)
> Not so nice really. It doesn't say anything I don't know about,
> except what sounds like reckless speculation regarding digging
> into the ground and coming up under your enemy (even if that
> were possible, would it be practical?).
> I found the piece torturous, and not because it got me excited
> about an as-yet unavailable game. The main thing that makes this
> and much other prose on the web unbearable is that there is no
> editing whatsoever. I mean, Geez Louise, is there one correctly
> punctuated and spelled, grammatical sentence in that entire
> article? It's one thing if you're writing a one-off on some
> forum such as this. But one of the things that I love about
> Bungie folks is that they are so smart, witty, and well-read.
> This shows through and every game they've made, and on their
> website. Not to sound like a curmudgeon, but were it so for the
> rest of the gaming community. But then I suppose, Bungie
> wouldn't stand out as it does.
All your points are valid re. grammer, spelling etc. However it's one of the first articles that acknowledges Bungie's gaming past. And I don't just mean Myth here.
|