![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| Wait a minute.... | |
| Posted By: munky-058 <munky.058@gmail.com> | Date: 9/13/11 4:07 p.m. |
In Response To: The Genealogy of Halo Maps, Pt. 1 (FyreWulff) : We can tell one thing from this screenshot: for the fourth time with the
One of my big questions pertaining the Anniversary maps was one of how Forge-friendly these maps would be, considering Certain Affinity's weakness in this regard with the last map pack... But looking closer at this screenshot, I've noticed some things that give me a bit of hope...
Look closer at that picture. Notice any.. consistencies?
What first caught my eye were these:
Except for the vines, this tower seems to be built out of three of the same pieces. Each piece is identical in design, but seems to have three different levels of wear. Maybe it's just rotated? It would be easy to implement the vines in identical and rotated pieces. The second thing to catch my eye was this "Tombstone":
Unlike all of the other (identical) tombstones (there's even one on top of the tower in the screenshot), this one's sunk a bit into the ground. You can't see its base, and its clearly shorter than the others, but it's still clearly a tombstone piece. At first glance these two tower pieces seem to support the theory:
But the vines actually hurt my theory. Even if it was rotated to the opposite side, you should still see vines on at least one side of the object, but the one on the right is clearly free of any foliage. Unless we can forge flora (need I remind you guys of the "driftwood" pieces?), these are two different pieces, and I doubt CA would be loving enough to include worn/new variants of any Forge pieces, even though that would be awesome. Thoughts?
| |
|
| Replies: |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |