Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Frequently Asked Forum Questions | |
|||
|
||||
|
|
|||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Search Older Posts on This Forum: Posts on Current Forum | Archived Posts | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Weak. | |
| Posted By: Chris101b <chrismags@aol.com> | Date: 2/22/09 12:18 p.m. |
In Response To: Re: Weak. (Pkmnrulz240) : Because you seem so intent on making sure everyone knows that YOU found it. : That you even mentioned credit at all is sad. You can take credit for : something without making yourself look like an idiot... but as soon as you : say "credit" with the intention of making sure everyone knows it : was YOU that did/found something, HBO reserves the right to laugh at you. I didn't post it on youtube to receive credit, I posted it on youtube to show people and put in the description that we had found it. There was no editing in the video, there was no intro saying that "THIS GLITCH WAS FOUND BY *INSERT NAME HERE*" I just put the video on youtube and put the people who found it in the description. That isn't a crime, that isn't even wrong. What's wrong are the people who are blowing this completely out of proportion because of 8 words which stated that a glitch was found by the people WHO FOUND IT!!!! I'm not an attention hoar, if I was, that video would have an intro with our names, a watermark in the bottom corner all the time, credits at the end, and then have it posted in the description a dozen times. The description had 8 words that said the people who found it. Of course people aren't going to remember me for finding this glitch, I just wanted people to know about it. Also the main reason I wanted to put credit was because it was posted on my youtube profile but was found not only by me, but by aqua14. So I wanted to give him credit too so that it didn't look like I did all the work (which I didn't). You guys must be very bored to attack something so trivial and meaningless as 8 words.
| |
|
| Replies: |
| Glitch Beneficial to Machinima | Chris101b | 2/19/09 2:03 p.m. |
| Re: Glitch Beneficial to Machinima | Chris101b | 2/19/09 3:02 p.m. |
| Weak. | Psychophan7 | 2/19/09 7:08 p.m. |
| Re: Weak. | Chris101b | 2/19/09 9:30 p.m. |
| Re: Weak. | Pkmnrulz240 | 2/19/09 9:49 p.m. |
| Re: Weak. | Hunt3r | 2/20/09 12:36 a.m. |
| Re: Weak. | FyreWulff | 2/20/09 5:27 p.m. |
| Re: Weak. | SonofMacPhisto | 2/20/09 5:36 p.m. |
| Re: Weak. | FyreWulff | 2/20/09 6:47 p.m. |
| Re: Weak. | SonofMacPhisto | 2/20/09 7:33 p.m. |
| Re: Weak. | FyreWulff | 2/20/09 7:52 p.m. |
| Re: Weak. | Chris101b | 2/21/09 7:21 p.m. |
| Re: Weak. | Psychophan7 | 2/21/09 7:43 p.m. |
| Re: Weak. | Chris101b | 2/22/09 12:37 a.m. |
| Re: Weak. | Pkmnrulz240 | 2/22/09 9:47 a.m. |
| Re: Weak. | Chris101b | 2/22/09 12:18 p.m. |
| Re: Weak. | ManKitten | 2/19/09 10:23 p.m. |
| LOL *NM* | Chris101b | 2/19/09 10:36 p.m. |
| LOL *NM* | Pkmnrulz240 | 2/19/09 10:38 p.m. |
| LOL | MasterNoob | 2/20/09 12:14 a.m. |
| Re: Weak. | sharpsniper99 | 2/22/09 10:34 a.m. |
| Re: Weak. | sharpsniper99 | 2/22/09 10:39 a.m. |
| Re: Weak. | Pkmnrulz240 | 2/22/09 10:49 a.m. |
| Re: Weak. | sharpsniper99 | 2/22/09 12:15 p.m. |
| Re: Weak. | Chris101b | 2/22/09 12:20 p.m. |
| Also | General Vagueness | 2/22/09 2:56 p.m. |
| Re: Also | Stephen L. (SoundEffect) | 2/22/09 3:02 p.m. |
| Re: Also | sharpsniper99 | 2/22/09 4:18 p.m. |
| Re: Glitch Beneficial to Machinima | DMFanella | 2/20/09 6:32 a.m. |
| Re: Glitch Beneficial to Machinima | General Vagueness | 2/22/09 9:43 a.m. |
| Re: Glitch Beneficial to Machinima | Chris101b | 2/22/09 12:10 p.m. |
| Re: Glitch Beneficial to Machinima | General Vagueness | 2/22/09 2:51 p.m. |
The HBO Forum Archive is maintained with WebBBS 4.33. |